IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 21 November 2018 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACF0130E2E; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:31:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=juReCxck; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ML5/psdl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJw0fuMC-6FP; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83304130E18; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142D423AE6; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:30:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:30:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=V 29QepCansevoNQhsW/YyswiO5LDGc3qPdaxBVaxWPA=; b=juReCxck605pKEKLI DNlthDglJrp9KxMhnSWPh3AU4NTNtDXvUC3LVHUtLlLkhFe3BDuhwQV9U4vdwmmX 08S7POkBIz21rWFbYWGQIRFgp4PepDxF2LEis1fDV4GproC0M57KseeqG4RxlQBS D99WCv4eIaDRUsAXCtRIFFWi6dOcdB/3SbV3p8INXBYhKgiqhcJ7e9wEOGgMCsL1 nPWDPb1QdkzIsRhs47cxwTgLf2XIAuOzzRqJRNf+DR7wVlirxJNkQ8b56Li1pHCv nKSmZ0wrPFDUbPFIn7zXYDmrQUjvkL1uouai1d1Js17HbLfFiFFypbMGPwHEVXou 2j6Ig==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=V29QepCansevoNQhsW/YyswiO5LDGc3qPdaxBVaxW PA=; b=ML5/psdlS+pKU5cNb3qdy3AN51I4syUrKpuHIr//Kus4YsAz8tFnrlEso ibj8z05H/TLRf7sJFC5MnvJ4cTjW+fnaVtf23hIy68e6sE4nHKAkcAlSTrIX6cvh PW58003G4yC3RjR9bFa/NtoajtKVsQFCt8RO26HbPbuVujNadaCFbUvTZxHNjz5J oTMb8cPxUpczNdcA7D9UGEq6IIt3a8nneA6eQZp1lPyo1njB6R74pI2tnHEVpMoK Daiaqdf2Qgj+cou96SrBvWcIDFHm+Fv7CxRKcA5g6AoitLRh9yijfA1TlYL0z9zC PIQMvnaVSHyuRsB5STbTkgVllVu7Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:RLX0W6PBwnZ1gwPsbuDfV_cLzlxKu9gsVurS15FIIebWpV1vdMfeHQ>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RLX0Wwqir8m-TpxisTA3HeENlehS9lwLoti4PSyAj7eZrkmEjrg81A> <xmx:RLX0W5PaSOt3cPdbXssXNfSm4_CDdupCqmOYui9xihPokdhZZ-wpnA> <xmx:RLX0W433BiMPAaQ4AglbrjryhVR5DI5i4rUhDu2l1TViK1VhpTMZNw> <xmx:RLX0W4DK6LX35WvqTWuzRpj0R5zdKj2qU1ERLV1CAkkTaVz-EJuz9w> <xmx:RLX0W1JojcmxQHtOeLM2B4FASgs6PM1TqVpM9VTWx2Dxvr1GfXGe-g> <xmx:RbX0W30bpJxtY1g8G-Yc2dYRaoLgZRLAm2hH_8XGD792A8rO_tLVkg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.92]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 60FAC103E0; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:30:44 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <154266072031.16394.11028131755209052240@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:30:43 -0500
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, dmarc@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8FD1E82C-F3CA-4A38-A8D3-46B00252DCEC@cooperw.in>
References: <154266072031.16394.11028131755209052240@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ee3SfomsqF9x8DGjr4pXDxrOCHk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:31:05 -0000

Ines, thanks for your reviews of this document. Thanks to those who responded. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Nov 19, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2018-11-19
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-11-21
> 
> Summary:
> 
> I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and
> clear to understand.
> 
> This document describes the Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) protocol, which
> provides an authenticated "chain of custody" for a message, allowing each
> entity that handles the message to see what entities handled it before, and to
> see what the message's authentication assessment was at each step in the
> handling.
> 
> I like that the document mentions the available implementations.
> 
> Major issues: Not found
> 
> Minor issues: Not found
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:  Not found
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email