IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 24 January 2021 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F90F3A0E65 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZfIzxyXm82j for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D36F3A0E63 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id e15so5269689vsa.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PdmnDIzV1fUKBfkuYgm4ZlqeRSLDRfgyCI4WdZigOmc=; b=HQ0kp6fw8k+KPb6bAd4w16tbfcv4YzJrszy2Ozkn86+sQH5TUD72p+bme8sKulagS8 /isJ6MLdXaU/Gy5SD5LELYDcZ7pBtez9obEtYiW42IrVZDTr/RNpPwl1b2dFVMb6yJcT T2ywU5VqCaZwVohiAp0280c61euefnolUv84APvJJCyAl849308S7ksRlZdDWj5D0D4H 3I4jCsLFlWgN9kkI1v0gLDqK55ySkpR4oMZ8spcXBROOZr+XtnVsghswAueRjizOUQjz F4pSftCvjKbaY+1OdDjVALu9ToX3/+r6yOIhZteIwlvAsuE/LtyNzGUHb4WD96x2s0ZG lWWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PdmnDIzV1fUKBfkuYgm4ZlqeRSLDRfgyCI4WdZigOmc=; b=uRw1dk4bGLZvmxoesi7fZNKBvXfvVgqws5Z/SJSXD6bi86I2eyjRkKECE4kxO8JUbs FbMomlsCMcb5h91cVdRW6dpKj4492upmpEZb/TZJLSNfX5PlQoCf/Ujv5xdxS4jwLTC/ rFEzYN55veeL103AHwP4g0l5nrpc2g7nlpqU3t5RdoG7LPr9QvyRUNOk0m6FG1YZvb9C LOWVQFhum3SeqKsO7Huo65rETJbZPhrFinMJxyx7wglskDEwiPFSiQVyPd5I27ZoJUkM SvSPjqEECAQ7AExAPpJ1HfvYULCkN66Gc8aNs5wVNTsHfoiIax/KK8e/8Ws3lHW/1Xo7 mvXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531k+pJSxxhmwexF+aCjgeWGY++BCsXAnRPmMc4/qtOlTwJx4SfV ZjkrsLir29pYIWAdpOIRbnCg2JGS4DHiaBkoGOwjlBIDeo0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0EysImIDxNCK1SZb/dOgm+awIONE34wgF4dOniewAV1ksizqiBtRXN5TxedHaz8/AQHf0uaUgvblFhIIgLVU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:18c6:: with SMTP id 189mr314477vsy.54.1611449352825; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fb93SkiAnL4cuCfxC5Wi1ERLeKhguWqAp3j8YEa6JBSA@mail.gmail.com> <87ima4wu3s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAL0qLwbiOrgsEjZU_V6W8e42SRNoUh7CzyngRMR5RLeQpzrxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <44eec884-a3c7-f0e3-4545-1032369ad3fd@tana.it> <CAL0qLwavpE9r6+O+Dm5EyDYzP9_pTpTbbjMzL1mPTyJky5CKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1oxkNUB_E8Q5do5xCruxXGvqY2461u0ZMZ1J5BFE8dTqg@mail.gmail.com> <70f6215a-4796-f3ee-3a18-5b91f553f4ca@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <70f6215a-4796-f3ee-3a18-5b91f553f4ca@tana.it>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:48:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaz+NMEQD=dgQMKdb7LfwsEL+-b7kFeE+fjWyPp3+4_1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003fafad05b99aca00"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/eetPRaK6WX7Xe30ThvirXMBLluw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 00:49:16 -0000

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:29 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> On Sat 23/Jan/2021 01:55:05 +0100 Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Here's the paragraph in question
> >>
> >>      <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under
> evaluation,
> >>         and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use
> of a Public Suffix
> >>         List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of
> the DMARC
> >>         specification.</t>
> >>
> >
> > The concern that I have with this wording is that it is (potentially)
> > misleading. "How" DMARC determines the org domain does not matter at all
> to
> > this spec. The important point is that we go to "org-1" in the tree for
> > this extra lookup.
>
> +1.  If we don't assume that readers already know what the PSL is, trying
> to
> establish that context in the Introduction is only a complication.  Later
> on,
> when Section 3 explains technicalities, the PSL has full citizenship.
>

In the interest of getting this done finally, could you or Kurt please
propose specific changes, maybe in OLD/NEW form, that you think fixes the
problem?

-MSK

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email