IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Stats on DMARC adoption ?

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 13 April 2022 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998253A1BBF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=vk2R4kTB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=dxtKicub
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iP3mUOhtocUf for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A76F3A1BBB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99070 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2022 03:27:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=182fc.6256433f.k2204; bh=JPCSutNBl1iappobhpFDxKiGeT7sWmLGi2MQyKw5P40=; b=vk2R4kTBabnjwIxxTis8xGErP4wY2T2c0JFXrNfnZhi5Fp9HqmwEHh4950xW72AuOLDSLrN3Tt4aOJ8lEZ+NVf9MrRGT6abHdWXxaccHc1ypFHcQCDdF2GmVdYJ6fypQNHooRtLfMzjeVb5UPzbHV7h6laajQSwVqcQa5bkcCbjlOkYx0GYh5OdimwJgH2ngPm6J9J103g7B10IdYMvpu+2Lf9UxvMF7u7U8I3T59NfFGaKT/q6ZsRqRt+JMMhVCK7ARrwdcx/nj54ZGxpC6KJfWA4GpxD22e0WN5BMZ2zCN+yqwHXk9fywH/ARv2MVV9A+5n8mVQTYdkztBG+/xNQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=182fc.6256433f.k2204; bh=JPCSutNBl1iappobhpFDxKiGeT7sWmLGi2MQyKw5P40=; b=dxtKicubHsMepZgOUNq2/tezr8BLniiL0C1Y7Ar9N89gXrxJfZPvO3ndTVAI2Qf429t1HINo/29/FLpPPuEzdiRmQ061PJ0vdjm1sxDugREP9fYAxwa7/ohEJWYKlVpqnIUreWJh81y3KehfGb5HZ4wHBxKEnkcq6NjRUxf0agaEqfMCiitK/vStDbklRR5VE81oAXh98xnn7JpJ6qRrV6hTSSb37/nj5xF9B5mRU4B9kSkS9agCFl7ltyU7HeRwD4To8LEDzGwdRLt2eXtldCGOD8v5Ko8ghkFzp6M+RrM1T9/UJkrouLg3TkglPi5RVv1dO3EK3lfxdd4Nn/tLeQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 13 Apr 2022 03:27:59 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0AEF93D48BB2; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:27:58 -0400
Message-Id: <20220413032759.0AEF93D48BB2@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ejYBedDzdxgLL3xqO0C1x-_yjns>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Stats on DMARC adoption ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 03:28:08 -0000

Are there any public numbers on the amount of mail that is subject to
DMARC policy, number of mailboxes implementing DMARC policies, number
sending reports, stuff like that?

Someone was also asking about PSD adoption but I assume at this point
it is still zero other than some small tests.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email