Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F703A11A4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qH_UR8HKk5z for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64DBC3A11A5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id bj5so10079877plb.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Zl/rdY4BN4hO0PuwXdrAFwpcTVP6m7Mk4wAvXj7l/tQ=; b=GIo7nPYM3fNQmjvuebb4m5385ka1rnvv+kfvjNEIUsjQcZcicRMDfiD5qKFjyYSsLF tv9sObOG+Fje3WJNbX/rGSG7OyPuIBBIDAqjaCwd8dBZJsQKrYtCu1MFnx+x3D6+O0dt GYzWl+dRvO0sNy/9dfgZfMm6aMOnSjVdw/EtYHf61Ynk+AtU2/h+qTr5+ZTF7HYCLNdb 359QemKWo2kzFRbjR++Vja9yfuU4kgpyzlxL3kocOoBMkfPEEqXly2RJMt+Meww8zWd+ lx4mDqVJc07aBlfTTsqFmv1nBSSgM5iGV1C/ZCceS8Hs7WYfbf5O6OMSIw9iQevj6q7K LQbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Zl/rdY4BN4hO0PuwXdrAFwpcTVP6m7Mk4wAvXj7l/tQ=; b=dVuXLXTmJMaXTdfflReZdzCfzQVPpiNXAb4g0/MUstuBpP1d1Vnfc/JMnMpaYUJG3E E0ml0Sx494YoLvhhbevzMDrs/0LRV0FufqCkZ7etVkC1H0w7esogrjuREk6A7ElXOFEt ygkgKr2OXByk8rByx2+QvqbGLe0nNPp0Hg6P4RijgLRjd4Ou/1wqxt7/PZctnKow/9X6 5tdTnrJjaJ0H5vi9i6DrLkyrb2j0AW4uuj9xyX/+U1T5K+068I2/N/dySZ8RiWMAMTzU aSLZFQTB+hWK7XikvWKurreWGTF14ZHXj4Y74j/TSx1pOKbU2seD0/S7q7gFMHi1HARB T5lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Gpd4h2pGSYiYwNHQcZNkbiUOJ+zDLZoDU2rnWTCcigFLkyKYd tzl27KzedrzD2oEyTbg3q9fUfnu/Z0c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJRjAUbj/FHkfoHthjrEU8HhRWulLdwxNXAQZ2mO5C+zB/Y7aqz+86nI0JyNPE2oZQapDq8g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bf0b:b029:da:274:c754 with SMTP id bi11-20020a170902bf0bb02900da0274c754mr4425845plb.43.1606233372637; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm15792353pfk.70.2020.11.24.07.56.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:12 -0800 (PST)
To: Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20201123213846.EB14127C8160@ary.qy> <efa0117e-5b17-800d-820d-b5d2413c6075@tana.it> <CAMSGcLBimU5NSBnxDEfSLnBkjhosrxd8_7BaTfA-A5bQyrTe1g@mail.gmail.com> <29d3b145-1652-8b62-5eb2-74993e95eb45@gmail.com> <CAHej_8k_o1yVjOP4wWR1Xz_Tuq-XA0snPAzNQeNPaApbRWy8fw@mail.gmail.com> <be400e78-091c-196c-2d7a-461050e9bab3@gmail.com> <CAHej_8mW3ENNMR7D_Jf6G5uz=EuGc3LCddtmrzVJR-GDq8Q7ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4e1239c3-7b3c-1e03-4138-082be0c49dc4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:56:10 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8mW3ENNMR7D_Jf6G5uz=EuGc3LCddtmrzVJR-GDq8Q7ow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/f3FQ28xw6aPneoFGr0hIPN6M4H8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:56:14 -0000

On 11/24/2020 7:52 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
> For point 1, this is from Section 6.6.3, Policy Discovery:
> ...
> For point 2, this is from Section 3.1.1, DKIM-Authenticated Identifiers:


Perhaps I am misreading these, but I see them only as 'what' and 'how', 
not 'why'.  The 'why' is important.  It is often noted in our 
discussions, but seems to be missing from the spec.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org