Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 08 May 2021 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38A93A0A5E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Jsww38eB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=TJf54x71
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkbWv2dPVQkB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2EA3A0A63 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10616 invoked from network); 8 May 2021 18:59:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=296d.6096df78.k2105; bh=Ov8mMrflUpoYorbSkecPhx5NBqfZ9om0bOQPrRL6e+o=; b=Jsww38eBTv3T+hknMVjGWXPlp9SdmxZBSSd+yoUmDO9+I5wZBIRZXh80zvKBxHTaXsDvbal1JBI2ztqn8P/1nZ3z1ky59nPVoZdJrFRgdDiaZoqFwueQRJzXADf5Vpw4GYSBhs1H0ZBDNAxOTqnA3rvkj3vGTv8eGbuCFoBU5c4Pt1e3873rzBTzW8vAwWcdy6NTwOjwf2+bVs+3J2NgetQe7eKbfOYGA50dP5rmPJYYZNFnDyVYQXdlB6wHnoAvEqCm+8dVbC3/7BfMZW1hygp5QDhnDGsUXhM+xG576AQdm6W11digDDlehmevZTMbe0tjfJJVUTIdW8iBxwV1ng==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=296d.6096df78.k2105; bh=Ov8mMrflUpoYorbSkecPhx5NBqfZ9om0bOQPrRL6e+o=; b=TJf54x71tPW7Z1n1blTFLPbu1ATT6PnN1p31CS4DRLO7IMXjynvxopw9o1n/tmckL2TN3Ax29tnfc6/PEflKJ1k3faTM3JiQ1aagbQqli+5fWSxo4wVXVUiAqMOeEs3/KXovESq99nMivk36STd5dt9bg82WrAuxKp4HYVlTQXT/4vm0YXlyngfsjRovK0rnrG+d73rW9aPZrfIo/6s6ULMo7LRz2n4EVvKKCvvi6m8cDBNy9IzGPTi+kc+GFwwm98BMBjbtuRn5japahwQKu0VYHHN7KZlxmG+AbqyTAj2So/O/RqGE20sbUBYa2gh7poh42+AjFq3DTGyFeyYCVQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 08 May 2021 18:59:04 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 868ED72D478; Sat, 8 May 2021 14:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 8 May 2021 14:59:03 -0400
Message-Id: <20210508185903.868ED72D478@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: seth@valimail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfOFhVjZdissdDFEzk8PYFLBXT=OnvoyT+Z_f01MMEON8g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/f4YCqzQxmn8dGljd1rkDBUfWLRo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 18:59:12 -0000

It appears that Seth Blank  <seth@valimail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>(With Chair hat off and Valimail hat on)
>
>Email works fine for reports, even huge ones at scale. HTTPS adds nothing
>for us and adds complexity to report processing (multiple paths to
>ingestion) that we’d rather avoid.

Just out of nosinesss, how big are the big reports?  Do people put
size limits in the URIs and if so do report senders follow them?

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly