Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 00:32 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A36B3A15DD
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key)
header.d=iecc.com header.b=HV0hSfxc;
dkim=pass (1536-bit key)
header.d=taugh.com header.b=po+hDJdp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id GHzyGk4PK2Hh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com
[IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7CD3A15DA
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99231 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2020 00:32:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=1839d.5e85328b.k2004; bh=R5AdRUg/Hpk189kNnwWz4Nsa8Ui96M3HkHlrOJkkrA0=;
b=HV0hSfxcTsKiLSJFxRb2Ekpz8BaEYOKXUq+SvFWZAPK36XbK+O9FDZr6RCM/7KnX8T6eRfV1SucqISmgtZehsnCgxKMWwX+gPONamAR7lBywW2Dk3FOHwYR4Xs2nYMN+pTMdvCT99GbS+Tygl+0Ktqx6aOsk5oe8b0JaP4Y9NcgvN9k0lASam3c35B/QhGoCciDTYOCtiqezfCPdV+fH1piAXF4z51KzbUXAIfgJ3eqLeDvF2EhHDLUTTM5alC3a
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=1839d.5e85328b.k2004; bh=R5AdRUg/Hpk189kNnwWz4Nsa8Ui96M3HkHlrOJkkrA0=;
b=po+hDJdpFQ4A3QWsl8cghzN+OkRKhLCwS4xG7KgXPNpYoSAuxRc0fq7xCKXT3GZNXJ+Am5s/Y0Tum0FVzziK/kZLP4FtOhAgzfQoNpqzMFoNQ4rlMmxBVLWayz4n6yO5xjGOVa+2y9dcrEGzOEC4prbagURHBZtEqCFd/fSSpv+zWnfweDXXTJ0rVhSAiIv+eriFmG6hmPlbqjbdoQKTpa4iBFHsOVzqghi+CuFEyycc2+FGSZnADoM1oz3rLMQB
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170])
by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170])
with ESMTP via TCP6; 02 Apr 2020 00:32:11 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 0B8AA16E4B5A; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 1 Apr 2020 20:32:10 -0400
Message-Id: <20200402003211.0B8AA16E4B5A@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: rfc@arcsin.de
In-Reply-To: <6b4c7533-ebee-796b-e00e-a2bb4075081f@arcsin.de>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/f_5vXBYvn8yqJ0ucELEpkR9C614>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 00:32:15 -0000
In article <6b4c7533-ebee-796b-e00e-a2bb4075081f@arcsin.de> you write: >To decide for an authserv-id whether to pull sub-domain from 5321 or >6531, one needs to know if the message is internationalized. But to >obtain that information, one must have parsed all message header fields, >per 6531 sec 3.6, including A-R, that is still waiting to be parsed. In systems that keep ASCII and EAI mail separate, that info will be in the metadata, whether it arrived in an SMTP session with the SMTPUTF8 option.
- [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601 Brandon Long