IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 18 November 2020 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C8C3A0BDF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:55:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FySmWNf5DEqq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8519C3A0BD6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id a10so336722uan.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:55:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GF0wPsJUx5lKX5VDZ852F76JQh1GY1QFTebEwKpejJY=; b=crOODJMy0NiajfEjPkCZrwDOFSixF8knBNyQDOuBMceKPnOIlA4O33ZYA0AFYMss7S KwuKF62iYN4hvnzliZPYUFX7hxaS6g3lFbwIaOLMRVdua/tSz5xWh3lITtndCYSy2F5W Fu8M/+JjUHy2QIsGnmqq8JDxyK7bdV+G9UYMRApeiFBVkWzqw0TgXppEzoGSQ5StwcWZ DI0TPRS1D0dR6oZWnSF99CoPNU8R4+TijUkECXiuBturIOxk6CQh7uZ333+fmCFbakKs HJ9v3phEbPjemlHLiPfgxdWNnSbwpTvFkWbUJBFqevCuZpe6dhptc/SVPy/Xd+6tmTeK Lr3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GF0wPsJUx5lKX5VDZ852F76JQh1GY1QFTebEwKpejJY=; b=Gu1HTI8SnF0R3jpwImQx+4kVmDAgn5dCA9+AgfGEoxi+gqk01Z0ukncqVjHsMTja31 ARVcR+7nNhRp4XrVuyuK+ZF6B1pNfIFpKG7uzPlQxoxNAOj7tjKXeXaJIJtzEevbNvho 85G7yDR/yVIMV2fBRAEoqjV07b2JDWib90km08yR5Zp+qrHhDIlJXC1I/U84NxHI7d+x +uk9gM44U5n9J3izbIs2i4DAtN2rxVQG13bm3lNk/gHlNVXesbwYpXZgQrLddWTzF7D8 VeN3CgGIyU4a4PxY0d5n6Enq/nFYcNlIpRfNkbxv26Y2nLSTmCJtFHuPD7FALnD/drFP k18A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532n0erDR1dR0UwcTfTQDwDs4GtpuepnMx16Q1BHJY7K/cxqFuvD XYW6NPpzW3Y5PkCDZVaKJ1xoLbIETSTt1rIHSgBGZGJG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7QP41HIaYBAnj2PCOeQAGfuXBTakk3ZGQ1eXTO2pl8XwqS07DMhovWy0iBTH8pc1iKZRb5sYVJnbcZBFGxfA=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3774:: with SMTP id o20mr2656552uat.67.1605682507443; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:55:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160513169495.16356.6565556939968267867@ietfa.amsl.com> <a21528cf-d048-6b3c-bb40-bd27658c268c@digilicious.com>
In-Reply-To: <a21528cf-d048-6b3c-bb40-bd27658c268c@digilicious.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:54:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYxAGzO-kbUTD7y0OMCG0DezgTqs+YdqzqGG_DzurihbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gene Hightower <dmarc@digilicious.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a723105b45c1787"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/fx0kZQpP1SNpa5Y-f0DdYYEWWfY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 06:55:10 -0000

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:57 AM Gene Hightower <dmarc@digilicious.com>
wrote:

> From the document:
>
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.html:>
>
> > 4.1. Authentication Mechanisms
>
> > The following mechanisms for determining Authenticated Identifiers
> > are supported in this version of DMARC: […]
>
> > [RFC3986], which can authenticate both the domain found in an
> > [RFC5322] HELO/EHLO command (the HELO identity) and the domain found
> > in an SMTP MAIL command (the MAIL FROM identity). DMARC uses the
> > result of SPF authentication of the MAIL FROM identity. Section 2.4
> > of [RFC7208] describes MAIL FROM processing for cases in which the
> > MAIL command has a null path.
>
> RFC-3986 is titled “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax.”
> I suspect a reference to RFC-7208 was intended here.
>

This error actually exists in at least two other locations in the document.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email