Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting documents, Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

[Seth Blank <[e-mail]>]

We agreed to split aggregate and failure reporting into different
documents, and this split was discussed on the list several times, as well
as at IETF 108.

The intention was to split apart the key components that realistically get
updated in different manners / at different cadences.

Aggregate reports and failure reports get used in wholly different manners,
have fundamentally different use cases, are implemented in wildly different
ways, and have completely different privacy and security considerations.
Hence, we agreed they should be split into separate documents, so each can
be concise, to the point, and independently updated.

Seth, as Chair

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> I will admit my memory can get pretty hazy, but I agree with Mr Levine - I
> remember splitting out reporting,
> but only as one document.
>
> The Working Group can always make a compelling case to change this
>
> tim
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:06 PM John R Levine <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
>> > I'm not ethusiastic about the split, but if that's what people want
>> then so be
>> > it. I will say that my experience has been that doing so is usually
>> more work
>> > and provides less benefit than you'd expect.
>>
>> I recall agreeing to split out all of the reporting into a separate
>> draft,
>> which makes some sense so the two parts can proceed separately, but not
>> further splitting aggregate and failure reports.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, [e-mail], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>


-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* [e-mail]
*p:* 415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.