Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 08 March 2020 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895F13A0875 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85XWaWPjULA1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E588D3A0877 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id f21so7460485otp.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c9i32K89sGUEbdfXQz/xeObvjn+DsSk9enfP1jlstOo=; b=iombPwAkfbsf6LVxB1gNWJVJ8TR3d3fsiR7IdV4Ym7fmj9GNIKVJYsDrAUQEYjEVJQ qxtSkyuWNQdUjQVAfzFTKE0BkHCdGFckj8Cwo7aNgH0XnzfCB3wcyTHgvXfwFPnxrQJT d8DJJR32+H9GA446kftLJRkfJPS0QFxjYru3e1RGQAAGegDOwzYgzIQSVaMO6/Z/tK4t fhniPs9I0a2/9ixfxKBxUt73/nRzeFNgQXhbx+Gbn3KnhF+St1Iv4+kvj9Tts+MD53K7 f9fyEkRXc9JHT/YJSvmk+zWXI9deEywmmbS9tx8kz20HoyBwkgb+AtVoyUz2C0/AGC07 /PWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c9i32K89sGUEbdfXQz/xeObvjn+DsSk9enfP1jlstOo=; b=GqB/nb7wLgXTMx9dQ7ZdrOGD3qpmDuHq4nqOY1z+gb4slAqkPvoTlpgCOM7cedLVfO W2tcLBaTsMNogIGzyakDxAp10N8FxqOqLf3Ykb52a+wz8NvMuukwaEMrVdFhHXVaRsEC pyf/c7mzT2uasqAAjEAa3x5DBW/iDkKdYaqSQLv0DfEsfNJzPf9PrDBMZKabdcL+skL8 IHKNnFuwXkxkD4toyvu5hYJIwui7ShBiW5UdL1D5K5yQFRpGdknZsFIPhVFRYTIdtc7g IWCsWbSA8Aox9m9RLvRiJmejVg1n0BZPEFsM1A0sHxqqjsCEpYcIPeAVGPr+dF0anKL6 C7RQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Yd4Ji1+NkfXiRwxNzyXOWaKH+5mOp5E3+Pkrn6RkuRYthFf2U fed8SbDiY4wKwnLkNljz8oDTdTHLIU6F3e2kGgQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vusQoy+dZToEl8jTWFxWKo4QbdSCWyf/sVezcX8?= =?utf-8?q?qJBkKR2Mbc81yihC12tZpLZy9ZvDtMrNHzBqaWmn5LmcDj8=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5e06:: with SMTP id d6mr11138498oti.311.1583695756984; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 12:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1rheCAfHShcRWrehpru2kJpCToEqwai1g_njBb5aJFmtw@mail.gmail.com> <20200307204247.D40AA1593AC6@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20200307204247.D40AA1593AC6@ary.qy>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:29:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EkvX8fJb4e3GV+RkroD78B4ujAqvQ_7xhnqOrt8o7yAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000007061605a05ce700"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/haMIWOkKvxGt3NbJhHtGiHBOmI8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 19:29:37 -0000

I would agree with John here on keeping the implementation section should
be kept.

tim
(with no hats)


On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 3:43 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <
> CABuGu1rheCAfHShcRWrehpru2kJpCToEqwai1g_njBb5aJFmtw@mail.gmail.com> you
> write:
> > Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc
> >passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to
> >update a section that will be removed.
>
> Only if we ask them to.  I don't see anything in the draft asking them to
> take
> that section out.  I'd prefer to leave them in, since hints about where to
> find
> working code are always helpful even if out of date.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>