Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 25 January 2021 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B53A3A0D31 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0a1QTT0ctuiS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D4E3A0B28 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 30so7953385pgr.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=2Y5vWi/baBytDrskVlr4scc1qFbj7bk5D4KW0npxhpU=; b=OjWLhO6Q5vJXM3Q5TLIxKU38MewlMeXtwZfRsIaspIgNu8kFJd2SH0c3G62ngfn3Dn tRPqSIcgkL8ypmdeKsfeKnSsCSTIMU0iQx77wl0TjCGwJ1GyILUYCvnAk9YSukgcLM+S N67lwYHXOvTqGAZJ3udH8UiaJ3XGGWL0yNkUBPxZ1w4RHESnN2IZk1zg4eDt/iYeMLlh GA0Rrl56oNKtg6iFI359vg1/8rbckp0yOgZ6a3mUTa5UesBpSxNX2QPYs6/atI0AE6Z9 eXPJ63EdYhhH3lxDCsp0MS4Nzb92eT07gH9Y4DH/S4U4s1GuiR5HrRkHmegjtO24pv55 mStQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=2Y5vWi/baBytDrskVlr4scc1qFbj7bk5D4KW0npxhpU=; b=pECzq0av1ccmhZQvabnXQ6Pxx4WCze9GTH7r05131eqiGECWB3BDfKkOcX7lZQmKwv GMhSou6kM9u8LFnEBRlMBncqiovaXRmIJhnVb//6VaFel+Ha+GEr6P7Se/CeQjpWRXRF sB0QWOkUA/khdjIEZXHixSB7inTE/9DextvrhmP1r1Sh5VNk1pLknfmbBfPigSGKupSv jJBsxjAGjzgPioOZtrIKtdkw1NArRJj0RDgqPCE5INKujCUy1l9vO8zqMwMflh5zK9P9 XfvUk3T3ZbP/GbRYG1I6xQ1WfiwCzdMnmMG/W5BlAGZUKeCrz/Eob9bycvcONjrRobd4 K7oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qWAxKtol4oXW4hDfrfyMR7RcM0fhOf+9d5rCOArM7fIl3yNjO LMdAk0Wh1zQ0rvohZwSb32hzHSK9TnCxjA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrfVLUnpNbEPMrLjJ1pnge8EGsG8cEhkiiGsiEYqHWyqGX6c19MZeWqWW4uz7JSkoeZGIECw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5221:: with SMTP id g33mr57201pgb.202.1611543467879; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-35-22.volcanocom.com. [107.182.35.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm14790672pfn.160.2021.01.24.18.57.46 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:47 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <34317129-8225-fb38-4ad3-e1b9ffed21fb@iecc.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <ff074ea6-19a8-e152-a775-4bbb1b94d93f@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:57:45 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <34317129-8225-fb38-4ad3-e1b9ffed21fb@iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/hvxmn_PYMbsDvSQOpZsb9n9JDrs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 02:57:50 -0000

On 1/24/21 6:29 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>
> As we all know, bad guys are at least as good at authentication as 
> good guys, probably better.


PS: if this were true, DKIM would be useless too.

Mike