Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 05 December 2020 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072323A0A4A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:56:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=l9ZAaERg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=K9nx2h+V
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xdep_P5kPEl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8EA3A0A4D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 29848 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2020 17:56:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7495.5fcbc9b5.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=Bf/m1rFwKixiQjn1dY0fN++MIB7ARYSPGxAtrVjsYlw=; b=l9ZAaERgBqMI8v76KsDZgfL2+Tu8R+n3LFfEXf3QZDC7y+WeqRDizN+cJe9yCIIVpzhJrfQW9i+SbiC8SMpp3nPFMDkdR5dX/ouDnodkUSS8P8uI4BZkpV+VilwMjgVcL6ScK5S/sfOXm6yh8s/gUJNdyiUMtttx9V1sKgFbfa4jv5Qzn/Y9wZppGu2jvLxQL+GLZCCBdXaddGDt41M7c4SUxKEyTvUuXNc9/RmfCQu5++KnDT2HsLuza4Ba3z41iYWWiPenYpxL/pHtnqNhHp2nbiusBsgPAYlM1u9CWXl6pmwbj7/1C9AK2QGsZURshj+1I/pXI1AlYRcCpDQc+A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7495.5fcbc9b5.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=Bf/m1rFwKixiQjn1dY0fN++MIB7ARYSPGxAtrVjsYlw=; b=K9nx2h+VFZncfJNKsEwIMtn3O2aggrnnApkskbt42I422jlRoGouOl2enjtFoilcwPSzzZNRvuX/dJNwip0Tts7k54oYZT6BqPvb1Y4qmfqVOSIJYlx1DuTFagT00w6UbB3IxTpuFkYche83YoTcyqryD55vezltSgoRp1fQBxWtVUQNVxIm0RagJHFJLMDQOUcAcX7m0a4PAroXwVdxoE1JijQhm/v1GJD/Oj7Y8twnzPVONxKMHAY9B5ETuLJ/brXIDihjbnLG374CIp8jBTu0TxUe6e5KhMljZhNqYGyGVcSxGNmpH/ftMUbTUAiNVk5JWrOhvd/FzeBuU00v3A==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 05 Dec 2020 17:56:05 -0000
Date: 5 Dec 2020 12:56:05 -0500
Message-ID: <c54d7cf9-c3ae-d8a6-d92-cdb69747fbfe@taugh.com>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Alessandro Vesely" <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <b8265b69-6e95-feb5-9486-82a8a88d3afc@tana.it>
References: <20201202233432.D45FB28E1943@ary.qy> <f719b86d-9a7d-f865-3e16-10eaf35e0de0@tana.it> <479cfb50-b98e-fbbe-e7ce-375557cd624@taugh.com> <f406f70b-3f98-a8fd-db9d-956c000f5c68@tana.it> <a4c256c2-d0a3-1fc1-b585-7b8659cd6a4@taugh.com> <0a650f5d-c53d-ab45-4125-6491c413f70b@tana.it> <a7bd1f7-66e0-1051-5cb5-e4efcb13cdb0@taugh.com> <b8265b69-6e95-feb5-9486-82a8a88d3afc@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ifAdrYtzD5T67FmYb825FBSX0Jw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:56:11 -0000

>> My intention is that if you send the report by https, you're done.

> The VALCHAR element in Section 3.2 of RFC 6376 accepts "/", which is seldom used in email addresses and ubiquitous in https URIs.  We could convene that when a mailto is to be considered as an alternative to an https, then the former should precede the latter, separated by a slash.  For example:
> v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:local@example.com, mailto:report@service.example/https://service.example/report/;

Ugh.  Given what other people have said it sounds like it would be more 
useful to keep the current rules that you try to deliver the report 
everywhere.  That preseves the ability to send it both to your local 
address and to someone like Dmarcian, even if Dmacian also supports https.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly