Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 28 May 2021 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1F63A1180 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=V6kYfK5+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ROObuQjf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdLfrnvPOgrw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C893A0BEF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 41259 invoked from network); 28 May 2021 17:59:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=a129.60b12f71.k2105; bh=EGZ/GOb8btJf9HH1NFI8Y7mdJU5GO3JP0xh4lt38XkE=; b=V6kYfK5+YyQ5/s0vLheK1wwcCX/IBWfKFKwuh//DDun6wN9M81pJXSPEIlmqF38fMBYoCgh0P3KUtPtxGCfTADauruD3cWo9qAehu2Qn1BTMDCnebfcLb8SovZoNXvMKV0IMLPCd/2wJa9OEGgsXPoalVAKhmHDkNkJ2ULdUegVDQAszYDchhmA9UO8f/ZZfRbh5nUxCmPSPg2+s/xKKFZEBJNXKL5LyIqU3SzgOPBX+gdVDNT1Skd+qzs9DOD4hGvodUxR8g8Nu7ohd/fn1OSNLtRGX8L3/aiaVxSnnkFE4Ss2DhVYHyoMUFxkH8o/yZMSWHVkVEniV1gB/+9mykw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=a129.60b12f71.k2105; bh=EGZ/GOb8btJf9HH1NFI8Y7mdJU5GO3JP0xh4lt38XkE=; b=ROObuQjfkKZXgIv+gSpYeKcqb1TilNKHs0D983oWm7RocCmd7nsy/lSiMTHjTNgSXM7V9uD27nu6Va79Ns7DUC9h6byBOTXF/NALzXqxJ/7KdMJLJS0N+4/mKVoJy/1CSjzDbZ/+c+2a8puhBz+8ajJcqLNlyXsDH4w/aAZ5PzA+QcSWfU/PmmjAi5/en+YUjTdAoU0ympxE23ymm/Ffw7k6OzKmrioa57mqEVW6J+/nreeEPxpQWeKeUai3cm3aKxatSWvRYFi2nsRhTSe5xC3kem5yOjnIKIuiNxtTr0nS2QpbzxAHCKn89vgzDltAqz3Cd6GWhfFwuj4y53tnjA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 May 2021 17:59:13 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C9D3E8E030F; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:59:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 28 May 2021 13:59:11 -0400
Message-Id: <20210528175912.C9D3E8E030F@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+G9AMvTT9Z77YH6t3cLveanicduo-J5ZkXwcaZ6nBbyVg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/jFibGkhW3mPd-CE46p8Xql8hYXo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:59:21 -0000

It appears that Tim Wicinski  <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>All,
>
>This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis
>
>   Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub-
>   registry.  New entries are assigned only for values that have been
>   documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification
>   Required, per [RFC8126].  Each registration must include the tag
>   name; the specification that defines it; a brief description; and its
>   status, which must be one of "current", "experimental", or
>   "historic".  The Designated Expert needs to confirm that the provided
>   specification adequately describes the new tag and clearly presents
>   how it would be used within the DMARC context by Domain Owners and
>   Mail Receivers.
>
>I don't believe we can actually remove said tag from the IANA registry,
>but we can mark them as "historic", and remove the text from the
>new document.

Marking it "historic" seems appropriate, since that'll keep future versions
of DMARC from using it for something else.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly