IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B053A105C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:47:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6GxCdG-fxtw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40CE3A1051 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id u7so10486954vsq.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:47:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U+vUZ8ASGQs+OiF5+Ru7NTzQtcQK0KM7iV/DgIMJJIw=; b=qYAvg35xe+7vicoxmYCCyXxNRrVYvOWwTYzV/shIoLLZ81AwK+HshI7woLKjswbndO 616fOF6qzEE1MPUPl66A1GH2Tv11lC7xZJ8F/mOUARl4BzjGHt35GdrILGL24m5tGhHC j0GZ0/FR/hoxu24MYPwaT0lPPcqy0HpGXP4zkfy2eqDj67beb0bzaH3e/OJl1KAfUFf1 7lkVCh2/lA+wS4o5qIe69ej0yQIPvhwhiMp9nuQ1UI46K52kmgrKl+MNG4wVBAE3x/q8 MlyO2N5Bcb03Psa8bWVq3JK1gsSvYGuHh0KRC5l16r+oRGTBHr/xlY7NotBsYWj+u95s ROPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U+vUZ8ASGQs+OiF5+Ru7NTzQtcQK0KM7iV/DgIMJJIw=; b=AIUz3yRAG+nn9EbXzDjMxX4BRv8dLGXyIUPT+OVNu+9eh6MlfBx4lMUPJB7y70BX8V 2HT0zzrpchkbqvwhJaui9i4UraxwBrsJL3pVQEyKtbU3YSe5NDs1aTBHBn9FoJ26e751 TGigKfCMetunjw52+U946is3MBmuboqOAwX4cstG5Nk/VIeIjPPJDJ5aX2c0qAoW2nKt Yu+/uFdTTq59AkHwc96V3Ao4/pMkCN7se7UR+NHvo5ITGaJYTZp7Lpbv0+k6ZOFzfL5S 4kRt1ISnFkcDfLjI+PYVYG0zqxnwp2J+w8AGcy4ZQwEfBNRrBts/yQGxBG67SoPgWXMw Qwtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53259qakm8Kjzlq7oG4SKwmjvzNLW/+AkjhwseR+PMJ/9b/b6gAw nyP2yewXfAcsE40g2zgIyjlli0YzC5fjrNaTC44=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRTzLyET7AZifcn5wSDdJUz50/rI0Yu9JtbgwQKs+X9k9c/zGeadt3/G5EFIBKtU2Pum1G8L+QlZCBG9FPNGI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:21c6:: with SMTP id r6mr10176408vsg.0.1605595621846; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:47:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+F9zJuMoWJV7Rp3fVjESdB4N4dE-AjJjh82Satd6br-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <801158ba-fcef-1bf3-497a-89e08c0005ec@dcrocker.net> <CADyWQ+FMfFeaOR8nBzSSZagp_msoDz9LfWfz-iZ+hKGgycWAOw@mail.gmail.com> <9BAE8F43-9B78-4352-A111-9549B7C46EDB@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <9BAE8F43-9B78-4352-A111-9549B7C46EDB@bluepopcorn.net>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:46:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1749105b447dc64"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/jW6So36ZvQjp46Jbu-A5nqs9vnw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 06:47:05 -0000

I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to you
shortly.

-MSK, ART AD

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:

> So what’s the conclusion on this? I still see the dmarc meeting on the
> agenda page, but without any agenda or meeting materials (unlike virtually
> every other WG meeting).
>
> -Jim
>
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 12:26, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> Dave
>
> It's the latter.   Alexey and I are quite fine with running the meeting,
> that was part of our conversation.
>
> tim
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming
>> > meeting.  Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be
>> > altered.   Since work items have been progressing rather well recently,
>> > and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting.
>> We
>> > wanted to get some feedback from the working group.
>> >
>> > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together.  Should we 1) have a
>> > meeting around these topics;  2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the
>> > meeting and keep moving along.
>>
>>
>> Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled because
>> one of its 3 chairs can't attend?
>>
>> Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be useful?
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> d/
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email