Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #39 - remove p=quarantine

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 03 December 2020 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBC73A091B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:57:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9PdanKlvUyO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:57:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651D23A0913 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:57:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id x4so1099369pln.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 04:57:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=uoN69lMK7Y0sceqpkNbuUOKfvV96WNUZJTCJiyWagkM=; b=ljj5Dqi5QYRy3G1dgI1mkX0/dzVumNIAkRYDIzIrInCVV0zN3eTnmNqST6R3bHPS78 yS8GWoKePckC33sC4iP6B6+oknaUAwvO3h8xJRi0Fkuv77E5nvPTffgqc35hMCwsWKF6 8EpJ9R/pZFujn21GVEp8sTTE2c6LIlEiOPRIzyWaMcFEHGYeSd2j+YTDq6vpqW0D7X0L S0kNUAmLfZhuJ2zocvZRg5/MOHSTEamOS7aUX89w+wEBXV5YBJg7I4Avt+YBtPAgXcWW doJiGFjN7IpH0uTSPE3ApTdAqD6Ib2oQl0E5JMon8Eb9vSGNmmbs6Ui8MiXmS5wYRzTU G6wA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=uoN69lMK7Y0sceqpkNbuUOKfvV96WNUZJTCJiyWagkM=; b=k5wyy//0lrB5lrdzzqV/jtAKs+bSEyk1EyjPloEKt/w5G9AzmjKRK1JlXQ9hJxv8FS clhauJho8w/d6u8X5KI9tOBQYTncLATdQ1/MnrZNfOcOQgNHSWQMPpBCEPDFdxElSQZt i5f+3afDq86qR+QnxwpaN8lXp+rGJoSPThUdHWKDJbpchLEbbeEovSiGwa2ifiH/yfm6 yGg5EB+vrGOSUDCk1RDFueSC8fdZ/ONc26QY810G9lFSEZCCLfYD6G1JOLvfJ40MMuZc unz6/fugRUUOHTsux3fhtNVWeWtUTmZh/6DOC72+pzuO7jZpnCxVW8xQejmq08P+r5n0 FaQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531flbOby4jfoBixo0IxFmpwZ/UDCLH1cB0cljDcY0qgMsfXgjYk PlfQFElCL4vgrbF/i/w1bmfHHw2Q37o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCUofarjQlXv6d51q7n+IJ2HnMtAX/bVW0+ZMN2RusY0erh6FEwDMsbzGQeX4qKh6fwOQT6w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:db48:: with SMTP id u8mr2927286pjx.81.1607000264436; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 04:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o198sm1877369pfg.102.2020.12.03.04.57.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 04:57:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201202021651.E8EE128C576A@ary.qy> <327860af-2fa7-63ee-4b89-6e7e383f3d53@crash.com> <2804da89-84d1-f601-9425-0b0d9baf6ae1@gmail.com> <1f6cae74-4eed-47f5-7249-e526bf1f5845@crash.com> <df11af30-2c27-0d69-97ba-bc058116c044@gmail.com> <A89FBA8A-E2A8-4CF7-A52F-D7437B48C6C6@bluepopcorn.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5d5c2409-7d81-2c2f-a1e7-4add06a0f5a7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:57:43 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A89FBA8A-E2A8-4CF7-A52F-D7437B48C6C6@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7D36546FD1A6C76A1B8F1306"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/jeJbnj_SwvoELy6-5gKZ1Xy_opM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #39 - remove p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:57:47 -0000

On 12/2/2020 10:12 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> The problem is that /quarantine/ and /reject/ are imperative verbs.

As I said, I suspect that changing the vocabulary is not operationally 
practical  at this point.  It would be great for the folk already using 
DMARC to state a willingness to employ alternative vocabulary; but I'm 
not expecting them to.

If we get feedback to the contrary, we can have a vocabulary debate.  My 
own advice would be to avoid vocabulary that is directive about 
disposition and more declarative about status.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org