Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 30 May 2019 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9959E12029D; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SXcanapUfYUH; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5207F120291; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a10so3749702ljf.6; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9HhA9m/darhWEDON/aaFVasWO2n37jX4jYBE/596WD8=; b=tZ5VIok3PI2qLtFwCWTJ8Pt+D8vty23N9q77qv1E0V2nAZZEilHI/7ZvYjdbDHLE6v SVH51hdA3IHPNHHAI1cJ7kRR5IeuKyNFnlJ2+lk+Z8dFjDBT6TtecOoZIWaGrtAEsZ9s RytJ6CuEjkCz39aYKQfETG4A8NiqseJcbdR20eV5Ct6qrhkB3F9NxpVMMX0J6Z3ELeV4 M8jOsVFCOnwDWUbzw3zpOP0FaeQbY/UTyDz2ZCb0IpNlCzXwLxFgmh12/VEH+G0yentl o+QMa4bKOqril3jBKW2YYqkCha8eSpDw/x3AvVdZJwF2kfwH6CoIX7fza8fjRW9RcWv0 Xajg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9HhA9m/darhWEDON/aaFVasWO2n37jX4jYBE/596WD8=; b=CmQjk0pLx2+/dC7OtUJuuKlUXKjtZczLSz888GNxDglj3SOIGiXYqmGJBKLyAMo390 mmhd1TdRtrofmGVUkohm1y85krvc1Bj93MslHhUGj+PBa4UysRkQIVEhvy9q3ad3y3d4 /xGJO57cOMZqo4/7PiZbk1pnPcv8lc0ACSww8VtnGEZP7l3UubB0oEyaDTDvBaPNAg6i TCz2bIqorCAsTLJy7EHmb2e2YyVdp/pq+1J831BNkoVtGVxwrszRKq9gebAreRhEM+UO 0b0NybBZJENeEGo4jOc7Rvx+PTchHQfSRv9pbsqIbqK9i+h++QEg/Ch28m7hB4cHdPaw 2NgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUz2E8W0aVCGvQeEG7Ggk1N4kZT4JQ3TMILmYfSelY7m7ZhRL8K B5jTg4AJS6E88kzCyTlseKWb0xjR39xgOTICR4PD2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0CVbnNE/BsBRk7930TgZXLdTVE25BJ1V6gik8eh/mOxHsx7ox8D1UGlAoe2JI7X3zEnPwjC7wFyYOnfQXmpA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9cd5:: with SMTP id g21mr2637682ljj.39.1559239581388; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155899759708.543.16777184314234317178@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJ+U=1ptq+__vSp8vgYzemc6kYiVG4jiY8tB-BbrGBRav7=eEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+U=1ptq+__vSp8vgYzemc6kYiVG4jiY8tB-BbrGBRav7=eEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:06:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbcdhKWOxSTN2Tk23mO6Nwn5yhKeJ971PpxEMOeUJDG7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Craig Schwartz <craig=40ftld.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e5c30058a1ec1ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/k9JD_cINsg8izW-R2RIZhwWezT0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 18:06:31 -0000

I'll initiate WGLC before the weekend.  I have some feedback from outside
the WG that I will forward, but it's not serious enough to block starting
WGLC.

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:17 AM Craig Schwartz <craig=
40ftld.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:

> I've reviewed the draft.  We plan to implement this as soon as possible
> (for .bank and
> .insurance) and would like to see this get to WG last call shortly.
>
> Craig Schwartz
> Managing Director
> fTLD Registry Services | .BANK & .INSURANCE
> Office: +1 202 589 2532
> Mobile: +1 202 236 1154
> Skype: craig-schwartz
> www.fTLD.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 6:53 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org>; wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
>> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication,
>> Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)
>>         Author          : Scott Kitterman
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04.txt
>>         Pages           : 11
>>         Date            : 2019-05-27
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
>>    Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating
>>    organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for
>>    message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving
>>    organization can use to improve mail handling.  DMARC policies can be
>>    applied at the individual domain level or for a set of domains at the
>>    organizational level.  The design of DMARC precludes grouping
>>    policies for a set of domains above the organizational level, such as
>>    TLDs (Top Level Domains).  These types of domains (which are not all
>>    at the top level of the DNS tree) can be collectively referred to as
>>    Public Suffix Domains (PSDs).  For the subset of PSDs that require
>>    DMARC usage, this memo describes an extension to DMARC to enable
>>    DMARC functionality for such domains.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>