Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BA91293FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7cjeC8KFNGy6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12b.google.com (mail-it1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919AD12426A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id b7-v6so3058315itd.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mOBiW5C2zOCdHMVtYfplmhCX6aK+rah8PYDaKueHqpM=; b=ZpyBea3u8sOu5XkLU7mtiLzRr29LnWOqDlRAqaNiSMjGC+Ot4JbXxlCF09vXjklNDx psf/CClDxe6xFRmZJAs9Iyz/Q32swMS8T5ApYfHQtLQu4XyRBUQKzMbNd72WBM0a9IAu RPRdxA1Bbe82EtwXYrep+ybRerXzd4cUEnEIbyT9Ggg0DphFMhYSY+4oSnGo3SuIvkz9 DkivjnO0Q1oa9wnN7no6BeSKwbeddKzIwxZywkHAq2tfbNB1amKRPiEceib7j0DzhtJc 0h4cKtFZhC82D8AHIRnDYoI+YoZ17b72Y6fWXTifa+/zuk3galqhljV6cGdNnRSJaLP6 Bsug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=mOBiW5C2zOCdHMVtYfplmhCX6aK+rah8PYDaKueHqpM=; b=R7maa6IbdB44o7zwI5OtItat9rao0zDoW2bgzbJYnCm+QfBO8iQamxY8OA4L9v0AWM hvZ9Yxbzj6nu3QYinqYKfqHl6CJZbGXpmfPn9K6vddxtR5MLzK5JbHE1ZXl3tUZR6eL6 nDoBdaqNCLLGYnim5PCAIE2t/5iyaSQEO5dhi65DhlDOvVQvP7Tqe4NauRJ5kgU9yKBQ p2Zwo23ABEEzFv02hm3wG76YS+9pfAtIvxOcrzpAhEVG5xeSHhdJ5Kh5ko2jeEjLTFC7 JDBAhoMOPtFUO2OyEQKlZlTqGa5RKrUKRSlKbCuT3b0Lr2Rr/UzTfAaVX8TczoDPV/7y SiSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIVNmp1nCDWshsb72TgR8mgSE8FSfoY52Nmsr37b8sXe9i7inNo V3HgvbNgFTDjs50d+vhkn0ItP8OHsmUAzOEaQHE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eSxuqfDn64YKCdz/mvO63Ayux/oIk3U7CDI4+Cfo4Tpq/05N+K8oPyVRmK8d4XomK9X77EuVbQhH8cvTgIJU4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c6da:: with SMTP id r26-v6mr5467122jan.22.1541702269892; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:37:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com> <CABuGu1pXaXioyPTV6OXD3hWBXVjt5+kk0dqaZwbDcKaU+Y6q5A@mail.gmail.com> <446b8d5d-c059-a7d7-c38f-9c3a92241adf@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZF55yaxZKYY8AQdcRfUr2WjMwfpd2FVWn3hCR67_E5eg@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EQkaGsDbT50g3-jG9NDkrHWVmhKJHruZ0vnvw5pV4DDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:37:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EjajNUuNt6nmV6tG8EEJmbApO5L7SmbTqN2BSbvA-CrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: vesely@tana.it, dmarc@ietf.org, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000257f6b057a2b88f8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/kB1DrsYNB06acvFjMUPBQTBZt3c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 18:37:53 -0000

Stated Very elegantly Murray.

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:36 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:20 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:53 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > and maybe it can solve the "PSL problem" if we can constrain the
>>> problem
>>> > space to just the DMARC issues instead of recreating the
>>> > DBOUND-solve-for-all morass.
>>>
>>> This problem is simpler than DBOUND.  Looking up text policies is common
>>> to a
>>> handful of protocols.  A careful wording might make some statements
>>> reusable in
>>> general, even if the focus is kept on DMARC.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, the DMARC case is half of what DBOUND tried to tackle.  If DBOUND
>> had focused just on the DMARC use case, it would've succeeded.
>>
>> If possible, we should be careful to create a solution that's extensible
>> to other use cases, not exclusive of them.  Reviewing what DBOUND tried to
>> do might be very instructive here.
>>
>> -MSK
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>