[dmarc-ietf] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-dmarc-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 November 2018 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B97D12008A; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:33:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: dmarc-chairs@ietf.org, dmarc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154273521107.29833.12344323303560312131.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:33:31 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/kLyxBwGHv_ZD_DXvpX2YiyP6Kck>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-dmarc-01-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:33:31 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dmarc-01-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Phase I description is still included: "Draft description of
interoperability issues for indirect mail..."   Isn't that rfc7960?