[dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Fri, 28 May 2021 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FD23A2C6A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68NRiBNDgyfT for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D9A3A2C6C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id i67so4505908qkc.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WXMsBw/gRZkcU/y/X0nWxqK7TR3tjiqHRCq7/IkSRpE=; b=GCl5BuES8RtE5LA0M9Rhw9kJtBeL1e4v4+aWP8sPuaf3E5Z3b+JrzqOUYiuS7Xc+om le34cJkDjlb+G1idWGrBKcRM/9m3cBNP0HuXAnL6uW6H49XMpWPXfvoGZbvGanGKJxVq OWTp0/ci2fKUVD74rME3jrRSLEhzbiqaaC0fTbPXevpLU9Sfr6Q6S5aIjo2odSCaj61G 4EpVZWSxdI6zbvlm94Q2lZKVUv0J0OG5ibMyYpXHRiiTvCGWI1fkuV2/Yu9tU8L/Y0Tu ILJp2Uh1S9lBqaInq5auXhO5HcZBQSykw9FzFBaWSl6w/+UOexKVY826ZQjxZW0bcVW0 C39A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WXMsBw/gRZkcU/y/X0nWxqK7TR3tjiqHRCq7/IkSRpE=; b=jKFe6tg1UY+7Ujuj+uF64zYuD2sVmpfie1VvmN7RttftalzL3u001gxr9+X15O9tBA 0bLmnuEr6CAXURHFaTLafNvm2Y4Fcc/yuIj8YFexZF4w4+gy5yx+cX/XlQFuHm/GjBLc WBBzWDR6Xl/Wf/XR47h0pGvHr+3etj9ncpuVS4fCd48h2Vwoc8SfUQPCCwSR6wWdHT97 RnG0qvEqA+uJrzHkGzOinRRoc60Suv70MtssgrN3b4Nyho0VaYIJGDOGI5v+8CCp5JUv SyLkzxzuUHApBeRp8D3dbhxJRndKecmzKgWCYp9rNJ9nVOcsur0hBBdznucBiOhK9+y9 8bcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300yfjoWJHKSBbbQiytdU56jtZk/8DCWQJbpTAYbn3/ceea/92i 0kFAjPWgdEActv03tSEL0w1xAL3qnaPcNY19sG4FunRFI2w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLloxF5cXNf5pybWxFF5Xe6zMYM6az1i3SkMUuWzhhfWJaZI9DXLyRoqBHs97QvTliGHeYhEzYCc42Qvbc5/w=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a84b:: with SMTP id r72mr4668749qke.387.1622216605036; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:43:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8mp7KtnqaH8fEAHTjoeN63tm_QL_L8b3oS4qbLBh-Zv0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007dfe5405c365bc47"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/kSi0PL0fksyBGnZPIFzUL3cmJl4>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:43:32 -0000

Greetings.

Consensus on Ticket #4 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/4>(Definition
of "fo" parameter) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update
the definition of the "fo" parameter with the following sentence, as shown
in dmarcbis-01:

The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list of the
options represented by alphabetic characters.


It is understood from the discussion that ABNF for the "fo" tag will have
to be updated, and this update will happen in the next version of dmarcbis,
scheduled for release in the next few weeks.

I seek consensus from the working group at large on this ticket, and
request that a decision be made by Friday, June 11. Discussions about this
issue should be contained in this thread.

Thank you.

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.