Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7670B120374 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Yrj2Tb6OQOZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E042A1203F8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id x3so64432511lfc.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cvpSLw8V1rwUXDeSwStB4oYZwOXl1H29C58CCcAw/HY=; b=ED+tzuKw/QQSgDm/RkTf/8dADTM47ao9kwAyHrkNjGCfAHysD/nr5a9iwNlsJ7U45F vcpQLcdO1KtYXXCWvB1mWCdD1WdWxQiSDVUgwj2Tba+YHdstV5CV8zfeX9Ne/9fZRiEQ QfoOw1gxoBNYN2q2Oe1CjlQgF6yfHN3JF1pcp7P+EjN3dMadXSTobcIJMevM7A2E5l/T XgDzFVp+MqXvu6laK+sQH0kTdhhULiFY2aJVwqabt7xOa2wlwHUFg9Oha3orcg+1bx6T m0v7cbEdxQFQq/4rdE+zLVWWASWTNAbwM25tOpFmK7A2lgb6R+HVJ+8SXICkJ518s7ia U41Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cvpSLw8V1rwUXDeSwStB4oYZwOXl1H29C58CCcAw/HY=; b=K2NVT4Y61KruqtTJrQ7t01PbEcKAHLU9s8q2+1Ni7vVHPUQRtx8MPFi8DjlhWsJeMq DBzKl/vL9MH8TyJtijmClR/NZVKs1dlvx97Vl91Bftpdduu6XMQ20fgDWYORpooS1aig hFKVWYpK2gfSkP6I+pN+m3z8K11csfE1NAF/wPiZhlpo6fxkK6ZLRUKsXEu+5DzHKGdO UQ+u1Lm02Ycyxb4MN/cbSOISDOgnHh46R/yFY/LP14oi7d7Z3ja0lr+jrTN4G7MIpY1u g1S5MkenBBsIKkEvM619Zz8Slm5zCHrz4Ou8aC2o5ArOGE66YSWeUNclZU2Rr3PED0S7 IXyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhlY0RZI+8dGSLWGnishcm23fsUhnjeDGqX0TrBO+Y4nzBy/Rv RHyECNJFmiea8tgsWF8a3//dzsKzaxpRDQ2k8kAVsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwV1ag+TTWZBqGNtbwurap+6hk17MxPyzVUw5TILALpXDo0r1Gef3cR5gipQSys1NYt6JibEPcEMR4DMz2KBZo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:288:: with SMTP id j8mr6698564lfp.181.1565191002078; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e580ada3-d9b5-0e5b-9ac3-eade41ac92d2@tana.it> <CAL0qLwa5yR5dVzkDSD48MDgpUa11+ri=KOwrNSqOxi8fB2i6PA@mail.gmail.com> <eabefc6b-7542-1a46-4272-b786433ed0b5@tana.it> <4783309.BXR8ZdE9c3@l5580> <CAL0qLwb5FAaYZ7AX_H=aeUFkv8cvY+xd1bQ5uCDp4tmrbx2CQg@mail.gmail.com> <7a21b80b-e6bb-d8b9-cf63-601a8d1e47e7@tana.it> <C1E711A8-F3A6-4A20-B71D-53FA773A61D9@kitterman.com> <aca25d30-3b01-4eaf-6d0b-3bae6f3f796b@tana.it> <CABuGu1ogeUjW181MMOv3kApZR5njMMH6_84EnHxF0tDq6bhBkA@mail.gmail.com> <db4b1289-31cc-9b9e-bb5c-01bf8d6a37b3@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <db4b1289-31cc-9b9e-bb5c-01bf8d6a37b3@tana.it>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:16:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZcBGL8syD8FyOUkVqMzsmj4=uYM0NaSU2O3hte02AZVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af400d058f886d5b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/kkjXLR_16NGaxd5aF9_Obt_HjaA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:16:50 -0000

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 8:40 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>; wrote:

> That's much better.  If the definition of ptype smtp were "a parameter of
> the
> SMTP session used to relay the message" it would be perfect.  I'd propose
> that
> policy.iprev be deprecated and smtp.remote-ip used instead.
>

Given that RFC8601 was published just last month, it'll probably be a while
before this happens.

-MSK