Return-Path: X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3711D130E6A for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:48:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=S3iQVWEY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=NFLLzVAa Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uvtvZqrtoyQ5 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:48:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EDDD12870E for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:48:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803e; t=1544118486; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=uf0h/f8Rk5t/WhEsINs5y+yKkRNcH1ne76mS2A9Bogs=; b=S3iQVWEYGtDugbvFi7AOiuKAzFjNFM1RTcHHeA55yFdHwLEuEWxX7+ZD Zbym2eZ4A0JlCdrJCWImLMFU5ypADA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803r; t=1544118486; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=uf0h/f8Rk5t/WhEsINs5y+yKkRNcH1ne76mS2A9Bogs=; b=NFLLzVAaGdgoKqYMfZvSONvz8k1lUV0UMqm3En44Q09iMumJ+XfAlIYi tSM8BYQD1IlAZ8w36NwmlJl4lAdame/Fc4saZvIUcD/piQyyMgwj2rQpxU 9ncdaCxoUd/W5Zog5t8H+AFRkiq2IA4BUuyeaQbfz+NGBnNL7YmR64v86+ 3nA+04NFSCPyr2D9CUUwYuJRoyd2a0uJRhs0i7rTccPIE/JwG/mJ9LAipp ckB1qw5y1E68qT9pUkWhUAH+NtvP0wxABws3MsTPKelaId+C/jtfSgx5j0 p2X8VkFuUah062cXwUhue+6f0hCvlMuW+uVA5rM77RbOYVgHXJ4iqw== Received: from [10.231.76.228] (mobile-166-170-34-81.mycingular.net [166.170.34.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 062F8C400F8; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:48:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:48:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <3e304d8f-ffd1-296c-c327-32f8e6b3ee6e@tana.it> References: <20181201003301.1DFFA200915FC3@ary.qy> <6368515.cyHHj4lf58@kitterma-e6430> <6D01ADF1-A11F-4FB1-9978-A50FEA5E2B0E@kitterman.com> <3e304d8f-ffd1-296c-c327-32f8e6b3ee6e@tana.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: dmarc@ietf.org From: Scott Kitterman Message-ID: <1E1748C7-2208-412F-9511-2468F9476376@kitterman.com> Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Lookup Limitations For Public Suffix Domains X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:48:09 -0000 On December 6, 2018 5:39:56 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely w= rote: >On Sat 01/Dec/2018 02:27:54 +0100 Scott Kitterman wrote: >>=20 >> Perhaps we need to step back and see if there is consensus that the >privacy >> considerations in the draft are substantially correct and if risk >mitigation >> is needed as described=2E > > >How about expanding on this: > >On Sat 01/Dec/2018 00:37:24 +0100 Scott Kitterman wrote: >>=20 >> I don't think wide open TLDs like =2Ecom ought to be stimulating >feedback on >> any lower level elements of the DNS tree=2E > >IMHO, statistics derived thereof would be an interesting read=2E I'm not sure I understand? How much would be okay? Scott K