Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28803A12BE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:05:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=ZeJfvWDf; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=fNjpgubW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmdjUkQQX8P1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B30B3A12B9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 83539 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2020 21:05:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=14651.5fbc2428.k2011; bh=xMVU8/uixPoOZF5KPi0+WB0IZqzsSgr5oZVXPjAMVLQ=; b=ZeJfvWDfAstJue3p4VdKr4apoUo1nnu1/hKTLQ1Za5E6sEIkOubXfYm8q6dfKB9ZHayps6Y6rnrAM4w9xSbrHfWBi0PjA7knyZeWfNIkjqqZqdUrW1TO94CiMwvgP3oxn3Fo6UTcFN55/VyKrfgV5x+SsfP04RYGJdK7iir3KY3QU9Ssf/CtmKh6vrHIzpU0MyMQO+IhUAlMNtFcffI+snF6d8VMB9QyoglBB2Y97IpRkVtSA0ShH/AGorNhqw3Gbuerp65iAquPKx6huUWfHIhvHnOkjcUIkRSEPEAYCw0/WeZOGxxn6zJjbsRRMevB6qo+iwcHLLeWkmY6J4V6qA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=14651.5fbc2428.k2011; bh=xMVU8/uixPoOZF5KPi0+WB0IZqzsSgr5oZVXPjAMVLQ=; b=fNjpgubWFVBHScsWsTgbp/6BSt4sMuXe3DRPEMFcDCLbYoBT9QjXo/ga4w8G7BdBblsQaSQHziVm5A1RJ9IBwKH9huKmZCA14KJINJUCAAa3F2G2ack59NR5vXzAhrZ9uDcWhYk+UTzz2I2M/kJuBmz/5HsPsdVtu5ui21uFtJDeZXc8Md84ybkqiAboMVBpvKW0DrOgCVVVEK684JPSN6f4OE1ZREuyZGaQSCSNenMoDtxYtB44pT7U1j9pP/xth400+6qhzfXSypuJynXpQGfWXguFephsRkJLSRH4vdMF/u8HS/kHucl4m85SENIZF2+6yXWi1lJp4svOEJ3lKA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 23 Nov 2020 21:05:44 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 694B127C778E; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:05:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: 23 Nov 2020 16:05:43 -0500
Message-Id: <20201123210543.694B127C778E@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: eric.b.chudow.civ@mail.mil
In-Reply-To: <553D43C8D961C14BB27C614AC48FC0312811FC37@UMECHPA7D.easf.csd.disa.mil>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/lVAYkPDyhTu5rC4YvTw0YAKVXeY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:05:49 -0000

In article <553D43C8D961C14BB27C614AC48FC0312811FC37@UMECHPA7D.easf.csd.disa.mil> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Even for .mil, the vast majority of email domains are fairly short with four or fewer labels. Most of the other ones tend to be
>individual servers that send automatic performance emails, and I think should be considered more of an edge case and less of our concern.

I scraped my logs for the past few months and that's what I found.
Nearly everything was four labels or less. Spot checking the few
five-label names, I found that most of the mail was all from
MAILER-DAEMON@<long-mailhost-name> and it appeared to be spam
blowback.  There was a trickle of what looked like real mail
from stumail.zcs.k12.in.us and feedback.retail.voice-your-views.hsbc.com,

I found nothing at all with six labels or longer.

So if we made the tree walk limit six or seven I think we'd be
unlikely to lose any mail that anyone would miss.

R's,
John