Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limitations was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

["Stan Kalisch" <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:59:55 PM EDT Stan Kalisch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > > As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
> > > > that must be resolved during WGLC:
> > > > 
> > > > 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to implement
> > > > are needed
> > > 
> > > There has been feedback in favor of adding this and none against so far.
> > > 
> > > The specific proposal is:
> > > 
> > > "Please note that today's operational and policy reality prevents this
> > > experiment from being deployed globally. If the experiment shows that PSD
> > > solves a real problem at a large scale, the results could prove to be
> > > useful in the development of policies outside of the IETF that would
> > > permit its ubiquitous deployment."
> > > 
> > > Because RFCs are (approximately) forever, I'm concerned about words like
> > > "today's" in protocol documents, even experimental ones.
> > > 
> > > How about this instead:
> > > 
> > > "As of the writing of this document operational and policy constraints
> > > prevent this experiment from being deployed globally. If the experiment
> > > shows that PSD solves a real problem and can be used at a large scale,
> > > the results could prove to be useful in the development of policies
> > > outside of the IETF that would permit broader deployment".
> > 
> > "[D]evelopment of policies outside of the IETF" strikes me as a little odd
> > since IETF isn't setting policy *per se*, although substitute language that
> > is just as succinct is escaping me at the moment.
> 
> .... removal of constraints ... ???
> 
> "As of the writing of this document operational and policy constraints prevent 
> this experiment from being deployed globally. If the experiment shows that PSD 
> solves a real problem and can be used at a large scale, the results could 
> prove to be useful in the removal of constraints outside of the IETF that 
> would permit broader deployment".
> 
> Better?

I think so. "[I]n removing constraints" would flow a little better, but yeah.


Thanks,
Stan

> 
> Scott K
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>