Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 January 2021 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8988B3A1947 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:48:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=fGaS99SG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=KksmG+oc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-lr1DSCTdAI for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73853A192E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:47:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9243 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2021 20:47:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2417.600f2e79.k2101; bh=HDhKez3LFw9kvca/eAHB9u29zcv5vbcUCnkjRYaD9Qo=; b=fGaS99SG9AldJULk3DY/agI7W0x0B2CtlOQosxgZqlM3pC+UO4BSjRGJe+6SfmGaTdugOMi6RIfW199GQ6EIlYXJaU4fJpIFqJen0ZNoYxhEXy20Cc3t/Qxoe5EfJJFNzjaAkQrE0an7IuuXNvqozysUihK3mMQyHr/pI4x1K6o7kON2Ru+45Jw1l5agkc9LlQUoXHOKOXnC8uJ1yagFUVHJdAWy44M52xQzNoqksCo8mlfZyysxbJ4ChLSCLU9i4tJW1K+WH4quaTiPi4o7RsxObhXOAavxdDv+yDsrnUMfvQkQ5/bPL7fZIT/s39B1Gw0Oy4Bb9Jzw7f49BLTu8A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2417.600f2e79.k2101; bh=HDhKez3LFw9kvca/eAHB9u29zcv5vbcUCnkjRYaD9Qo=; b=KksmG+ocdVWWbRgdjbiqQxDp/wA+x4E+4M6rhXorDT0Rq5TeBDbetWvxzeCMOlBT/B8TAprI+aalV1bA78SFk579wsXxAvjUp+NXAZuKutNCbi/tOfEU9lRgYrBn3c7VIdwQGht01M+fLwEigwlyDuBCm/YNhvyB1r20q0KRp5zzE8YmtxvGMZMlC6SkvBZkLOrGg8KJfk247AZN7EfoSrcWCyhVtCzr2HPp9eJbvaPizoW+vOi3b791imm501ieM1zEDxpzlKh96IAupMmmVf6aBLmdYw9ecwVAud5WqnYT//mhIXGdojgdjmLSJzDYZb7WUdzt8wXNiJwXg027hA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Jan 2021 20:47:53 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A17426C143BC; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:47:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B7A6C1439E; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:47:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: 25 Jan 2021 15:47:52 -0500
Message-ID: <b2ab99a1-7174-e027-903b-c112e2d77f73@taugh.com>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Alessandro Vesely" <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <62e65ae9-f7d3-af7c-94f1-63bf07bd38cc@tana.it>
References: <20210125195231.E0DE16C13E26@ary.qy> <62e65ae9-f7d3-af7c-94f1-63bf07bd38cc@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/mOcYW39Z_RXh3xmUTAtctBOGQaw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:48:06 -0000

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> For at least the third time, there is no "domain being reported". When
>> I get reports from Google or any other multi-tenant mail provider,
>> they do not say to which of their gazillion hosted domains the mail
>> was sent. That is not a bug, and it's been like that for a decade.
>
> Yet, an unauthenticated report from Google would prick up your ears.

How about an authenticated report from google-reports.com ?

R's,
John

PS: this is getting awfully repetitive