IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 10 April 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA22D3A0825 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gX83UBSEk_mR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A54C3A0822 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id i75so2073904ild.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zxVe4HbWa6tSrU7mumBHxS3duPeUdbVCfdrrn+huhjI=; b=XRa1o/sdPI4XRgzKqhpUHbIwS4gQCoP1ZFAMDb6hhhKFGqfR51KQ5YuIQf+ROkv09S 5wFKHE9CRO6hVJYerKT+XL5chISvVSaGnwIO/NvFI5L18M5AgwZ/mxyR6VDllh0M9L6f ekHzaQbs/8SnYv8qlQIZbq0mBBtn3lzi3caIA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zxVe4HbWa6tSrU7mumBHxS3duPeUdbVCfdrrn+huhjI=; b=DC4sCCsP4h8CNEoHtHlIbvloRHYKLxWpZMzFppNDLM28Pb04wffgTFtuBi1Q3RMcdU UUlqoYpYtC+Z0LcALgdSzLFeho2aHtXgSAusW+y+dDVraMS1yWfTGk7fotCNbepkC9SU 67DV/6Js9bPbmmUCDrO5PgTiA2BRlnYrDVOBWYLQ6tSab3r/cEhPlEtziMSrlC6H/9bm Blvrh1eQDLlct4wmNNjaAxnRpFMaFqImOkwaKl3ZzJkItkhzR7WzhJ2Zm1USMq2RjHdm G479hYAQO8bZZOSF4nLypxW49Zfa1L9zq5oWrBopyT0k5ypP9Fq6qs7hjX1zsFU29xDF s/HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaA4j90cO43MNk9ZDu9z0xroqYStbEEgrmgWAdcoLvUxzJB5jHx yWgYi/ZkAvsfccyCHVRpuK1IcIZS4Cav7AgZ5t7gyrvG+XE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLHZye1fkU6j9TIN7dfZ9l3YzeOf9p7q5GHq2bPlmwQe/MKBJIbtcdm+/wzADSTW9piUXYH/FuZmQD/uJPZKQw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c787:: with SMTP id c7mr1848296ilk.120.1586532096104; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1rekWo3mRkK_OpRksYNrSmPaFHD6k1_K=a7a_Sx7aMhBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200409230933.E0CBD17638B4@ary.qy> <CA+Wg=gsS0U-cW8TAFhJw9yQrCP7K-8gjGGDhg1sighiBc5JrgQ@mail.gmail.com> <3377169.EuQdDTRyQv@sk-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <3377169.EuQdDTRyQv@sk-desktop>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:21:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1o3QSJk-uebs8VtKCjh4fRzjgrixZWFRZuwJCbNXTYE-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000038d1205a2f14ae9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/miDoWMwi-CR_hayQTRaNqVOcj6w>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:21:40 -0000

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 6:49 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> On Friday, April 10, 2020 9:38:40 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> >
> > I don't disagree, but what I was going for here was some level of
> > consistency with section 3.2 of RFC 7489. . .
>

And it needs to stay entirely in RFC7489 :-)


> > Dale twice in his comments expresses doubt that it's possible for anyone
> to
> > know all PSDs; the mention of a specific PSL in the abstract was an
> attempt
> > to answer those doubts.
>
> > But how to address Dale's concerns about how one knows all PSDs?
>
> To the extent this is a problem, it's RFC 7489's problem.  This document
> leverages it's existing definitions.  That's intentional.  While the
> current
> RFC 7489 definitions aren't ideal, as an extension to that work, I don't
> think
> it make sense to try and fix it here.  That's work for 7489bis.


Agreed. Dale's concern is a non sequitur. We can always invoke the ghost of
DBOUND-past :-D

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email