Re: [dmarc-ietf] [dbound] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt

Dave Crocker <> Wed, 03 April 2019 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307A12013F; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kj1xJBNt3wJ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02330120163; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x33Irdee004165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:53:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1554317620; bh=oYp3+ESlg1TZsFS+AAMMYcb1cJVZ+kEfzAgEJrxLYZs=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kzBzdafWGhM4KJHi0wY2qEMB2SresZurjKCmwvsQTa7deSeGNJQOY1iVsAB6VtRB1 NYs9HLsB+FxXuP7qpYgzO6Mik1QOPOCxTSLBm+2s+ATi614GHT+A6wGDN8JBXCfMfB 0+Oqc26tMgtwK34KFl9sJ7Di3Dm+xx0/nqLXtzyY=
To: John R Levine <>
References: <20190403175820.8391420115F376@ary.qy> <> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031430270.21189@ary.qy>
From: Dave Crocker <>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:51:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031430270.21189@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [dbound] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:51:59 -0000

On 4/3/2019 11:45 AM, John R Levine wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Dave Crocker wrote:
> In my experience, these days getting a new rrtype that doesn't have 
> extra semantics into DNS servers happens pretty quickly. 

Now, about /end to end/ support, not just publishing...

Please provide some examples comparable to your proposed use case.  That 
is, what are new RRs that are getting well-scaled, on-going use, defined 
in say the last 5 years?

>   My dbound draft has no new DNS 
> semantics, just ordinary wildcards and an ordinary rrtype.

I noted that.

> To put anything into the additional section, you're asking the DNS 
> servers to treat a _perim name specially if there are TXT records under 

I noted that.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking