Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 04 December 2019 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912AE12012C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 02:38:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf2KvXtWgUZR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 02:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0422612001E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 02:38:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1575455893; bh=uepyKBDkD8DQD+Y6cDGW/pUa2esT54i5joynjEHx8As=; l=730; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CDOvbHeBOp9lDa7su9xIfmhxaEDq6mKXb90ubYrhfCLxOy0rogvviq3sLo7yoNP/5 CIdPHTZcCBxyuswPS2ogBs3bQ9JGGolr9EzlSvA8BjEU25YO7pvUzOEDya+1sxNVMP oPWljxQAsk1WRANT/hmghEmMDwvVyGQGsJhZ0MJnzObNK3gv1c/lny+aid6Mb
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA id 00000000005DC073.000000005DE78C95.00001086; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 11:38:13 +0100
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwbo1AtJ6LG1UuSSoBC-GwjdQsc5CA2h6q5VqMxH=dxK5w@mail.gmail.com> <20191111155410.12A31E9E35A@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwa=zs29zKHZmhzB7RSQyT7wRUCdqh1LSLTksX8d6h5naQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <3c69eec8-3101-fc68-2405-794b77760274@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 11:38:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa=zs29zKHZmhzB7RSQyT7wRUCdqh1LSLTksX8d6h5naQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nKfBzNlQv0aE3aNQPMg206EJj-o>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:38:19 -0000

On Tue 03/Dec/2019 21:22:28 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> As far as I know we're talking about "dnswl" which is a method, not a ptype. 
> There is one known implementation (CourierMTA, I believe) which is the impetus
> for the registration.  I think the name is constrained to whitelists even
> though DNS-published lists might have the opposite meaning, so I wish there had
> been some discussion before there was an implementation.


Started in 2010, resumed in 2013, the discussion about how to implement whitelisting in Courier-MTA was mainly concerned on configuration syntax.  It is archived here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/courier/mailman/courier-users/thread/4CA0879B.9020707%40tana.it/


Best
Ale
--