Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425D23A0D43 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:11:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkJ1AFAsyhRH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3853A09D7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id q3so4473168pgr.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:11:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=mPjOKUyJNlDb7n/kiwgqTJSb0M5G0Whc5vxuMShgtTM=; b=otdtyYkY47kdrt5FjqYekyXb748U9mBpBWAK63KgeOZL/s0b1bo4Zl5ngAFKPOno4o rS33n42rAPagqgdX6lOTSfZICtsZSpHV/trmRQyDIX5UYihG5QIFTngYxRK3WLsT8eGD OXQj8STIaDrM4WqBoQ3RoJEyJ2N/UNugTo0fAYTV0cvZBax6SBDdUWSA3Ia5gz3CAIke 20qrONDiytYySZWHB894Pjqkxe+38zEV8XcT29eOvGrqcTwf+rD04yUptHWUxvqP/tNb HFkz/suGRc6sZR0TZiBAl8zueyoKkjvSkP2uuLURqlXN4mJ0C4ovFdkWrW/IdvljaDnu Xoaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=mPjOKUyJNlDb7n/kiwgqTJSb0M5G0Whc5vxuMShgtTM=; b=gEvZ2+fMATMCXDCfQsIIrpARvlP8/hGYjxcnrm7xXk7JmvK5VeXPthEcyh0uIt07tm ab56eSkf5ABx1PJzzSSJ0ySdhGPZ4tqKBM7ho1Cw1G9Lt5d9Z18qPkCBNfaF8BtaktMD VdmioJfjDKBbJIbjeExHm9QSW5YSNHYcob7RoVrqHvltJouG9K4U08km6Mxf8E5aJ2bi fl3deD1toyoWvYet/6zDkFmq5i6RiB+S9BywZy0ZE8JDnavLfTl6UdcQ0CGhdEUrT2p3 1XT06XPclOtOkaIdtWTv7vSHkO5SGzCsXNfReUjwrbYLBSLbF1OUfRDlv/mKeYdVW8FN +LfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Jyimvt9sSShUy6RrmJQ6GCFIldgQ36uIJJHLRkZpqvsqsl3RD S/Iiwv2zC2oNyH1CtLFmJeLjEwCMot4tPQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwY8J/gWOsVdNFJaErXRIhOGi9IUS3Pi8WMPkQVgUkolOa8s+M8Ext0CSsn/tcU8uhgsJAivA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1683:b029:19d:917a:616b with SMTP id k3-20020a056a001683b029019d917a616bmr5938514pfc.15.1607123478518; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-42-33.volcanocom.com. [107.182.42.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k189sm6713376pfd.99.2020.12.04.15.11.17 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:11:17 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com> <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <c0ee5678-822c-40b3-9072-e6a4c350f34e@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:11:16 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2ED3720F309A0E7317309B54"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nKjlhw_3Pnn28jHBt2WeaXBxTpg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:11:21 -0000

Is it really that hard to summarize why the decision was made and what 
changed in the bis version? I really don't understand this snipe hunt.

Mike

On 12/4/20 3:03 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-dmarc-chairs-slides-00 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-dmarc-chairs-slides-00>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:01 PM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com 
> <mailto:mike@mtcc.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 12/4/20 2:59 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>     On 12/4/2020 2:51 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/documents/
>>>>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/documents/>
>>>>
>>>     What changed in the bis version to change its intended status? 
>>
>>     There is a 'History' button to click on that page, to answer that
>>     question.
>>
>     2020-11-11
>     	00 	Todd Herr 	New version available:
>     *draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt*
>     2020-11-11
>     	00 	(System) 	Forced post of submission
>     2020-11-11
>     	00 	Todd Herr 	Set submitter to ""Todd M. Herr"
>     <todd.herr@valimail.com> <mailto:todd.herr@valimail.com>",
>     replaces to (none) and sent approval email to group chairs:
>     dmarc-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:dmarc-chairs@ietf.org>
>     2020-11-11
>     	00 	Todd Herr 	Uploaded new revision
>
>
>     is responsive to my question in what way?
>
>     Mike
>     _______________________________________________
>     dmarc mailing list
>     dmarc@ietf.org <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Seth Blank*| VP, Standards and New Technologies
> *e:*seth@valimail.com <mailto:seth@valimail.com>
> *p:*415.273.8818
>
>
> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential 
> and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of 
> individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and 
> authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, 
> copying or distribution of the information included in this 
> transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately 
> notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from 
> your system.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc