Re: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80201203C2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=ASHiec6h; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=nf6XVFdZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-Q5QeGQ95sW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2516C120310 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFF3F8071F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:33:44 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1562952823; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=+7it8Ie5WIXV+ve8DgKFtW3vFbffpS71mhTtoi3Z7/4=; b=ASHiec6hD/u4uZAgKctVfsEcjXl5prRBjGNWRAPhQEcBiRwJXSW4vxjv zQU7J+ocNEfEzgLfleo13VGgSk+CCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1562952823; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=+7it8Ie5WIXV+ve8DgKFtW3vFbffpS71mhTtoi3Z7/4=; b=nf6XVFdZ1hWi+5XEPQHoNiDenh1utD8MybMGT7K8NiPDeZOcPUtWiwbj c0WS46y0gD6X3exNcaEOyfQS8wt8yujw08vhQnmKRQiKzBU9BtMm5ujTIv jg+pONe7ppEyEeXsrCw4lsUTwolAbqX8Pgq2kohqZQtxTdzYRNNm6Swf2j Oh/D+bj/MWZcaEso1QAHnSRytvG8PTAPuxmIktrxLOmdFAGIWVcB5rlBH1 cBHYu83t3c0JP754kxQcrMRWkB8SIN0AHvVLJYetIe2++2W2y3IotPAe1S QgEgPcc8ZiplZPHAyGJDmxHkfK3tMD5ueDqyXwLh5J2JpXABeVKshw==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC218F80607 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:33:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3070360.9zhkp9JZm9@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <540f8051d1694c5a8f66a705bb26f41b@verisign.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <1890995.riJRFoXRoW@l5580> <540f8051d1694c5a8f66a705bb26f41b@verisign.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nOAePnJj3zYNHo4b_Lp-mX4hkpk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:33:47 -0000

On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:31:40 PM EDT Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:27 PM
> > To: dmarc@ietf.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Working
> > Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
> > 
> > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached
> > > consensus that must be resolved during WGLC:
> > > 
> > > 1. What further context is needed in the introduction
> > 
> > The only comment on this so far during WGLC is that it is clear as is.
> 
> Perhaps you missed this original comment:

...

That's issue #2 in Seth's email.  I'm writing that one up right now.

Scott K