Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 10 April 2020 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4393A0CD8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=hWsT6dNw; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=kGrXH5cY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MRcL52kR4BLd for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 005133A0C74 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 96025 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2020 18:21:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17717.5e90b914.k2004; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=+uOvN5Cn9qMRBd/Oc41mUO70naz3kyAT50oXfrNBHP4=; b=hWsT6dNwRP71yXugkDWppFWLKAA1LhBtVJKibhUqt0bBc6FrtRLcoyLVLHDIxdymdnXAN3zmgkbFKiDFdT4uoV/69m0Bwaq0iKI44beIAyY2OmtM57Sy29SLytffDmgW9E1pUdtuweY12hyl5DrF4BK4XCmcDnUVaIxnDzyGolpGBeaJhZF7K516SX5eqcwB4WKud5qYWw1IgeRfaWZUs3Mv3xcqnwxwrlahcndh7Cjh2UvWUJHkXt0JY92AnwSL
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17717.5e90b914.k2004; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=+uOvN5Cn9qMRBd/Oc41mUO70naz3kyAT50oXfrNBHP4=; b=kGrXH5cYlj+7eP0viHBsNEvVj1zlRL+kdaF9i5CtBQDW5aUIMzWS/NJrX7jx17VA4knxq8WlM/8Wj+GDTBmnsU7AysCiQWoEJ9Uzw3ScrQSZZ7JCFZJ7QM25bV6RKDg2CxsY5xyfamOneE2fAjjngpdUOJH7owCTmIIvzAVLj7gvA4to8ffN0PLCLjzf9gESHN43vjphKoMesPEzmVykVvHxlpllGT1hVo49dw/qFzE9oZpOvr7Qf/o3qj1Hv2QU
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 10 Apr 2020 18:21:08 -0000
Date: 10 Apr 2020 14:21:07 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004101412550.84760@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Tim Wicinski" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+FAt7P7DXDXXtfOmS2ED=QLmFAMu==k7Vtt7CZVwb6E-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+EXPAMWXNQrgkbx=skKOHN-j+QicCser1rTg1anwPwonw@mail.gmail.com> <20200410163409.B0AE81769C14@ary.qy> <CADyWQ+FAt7P7DXDXXtfOmS2ED=QLmFAMu==k7Vtt7CZVwb6E-w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (OSX 407 2020-02-09)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nZ1eh1wXNCM3tU8w-Vv4ccbC4Og>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:21:22 -0000

> and I remember seeing a spreadsheet of all the second level domains that
> ccTLD registries offer,
> and it was quite lengthy. (Longer than the list in Wikipedia)

Per the PSL, there's at over 5800, there are ccTLDs including AU US CA JP 
that have second and third level and a few fourth level registration 
points. The less we say about this mess, the better.

I realize it's late in the process but I think the draft would benefit by 
moving the examples in sec 1 to an appendix and replace it with something 
bland that just says PSD == Org-1.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

PS: pvt.k12.ma.us