Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #53 (Remove reporting message size chunking) - With Interim Notes

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 30 May 2021 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E313A198F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUf9xYQtoBsp for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com [209.85.208.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C973A198D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id w15so12660688ljo.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ijFenXV1yKtQEsyXcUzhnRhy/+/78p697srR7cuF42Y=; b=WmyHA96qdBBUZFPVhRBwQY06ZsedAAzfjD9qmGQZ5tthLSwTmE69jmwq69DM/XCQW8 WLMwnc4UHkXOxxksXWYzLfZpE8yLrRSv3BCiH4Uc7waqBKxPE6JzDuspwwyqFf4nLfE7 ODfxWpGyEvax7SUqkLCKLJrRh9MpLakorZIaau6P/ofUHOa2jPV27qMbIIc7ufi21uUS bMvzangghafEJfaHEXVuo/6Ovn5QhTDZ2TY7ADPTjQX1IpZhnWK3zJaGEOf6bdRuwN2K 7KSA3V1P86uE2bX+Po27yjMGWiv9iEvz0Wv1kv9QP/AHuLumM1l8uBP7BTQlH3YOo/lg /P9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WjvmfltQg4naTwgSw2eLuJuXOW1KAUdIS9ck1T2pX88SMnOtz m53bplC8SR/YiDI9EYvWzuGOK3ydyqxHhuAP1tBlrXTd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRHNwcFnshv5He9iFJ7kDaPnNqyXSAZo90EBlZzHdi7UXek1VXzDWZYR/OmpS6bZ9u3FTAHtmMHkDV+Hvhgd0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:90d6:: with SMTP id o22mr14693207ljg.473.1622418079596; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8npHwekgJDLOV=hVPdd0OFoMumJCKL5Yitz5oWrhkQdNg@mail.gmail.com> <a8ef636c-815a-6b40-a955-b7049afba82f@crash.com> <a7fc5ba7-e17b-72b5-e81a-1dd0ac6cb418@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <a7fc5ba7-e17b-72b5-e81a-1dd0ac6cb418@tana.it>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 19:41:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+FGMBA2AuNzwUOyA5eccUkQ399Kc3c-oj99oZRov8oPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004fc28605c394a5aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nod3SmW94krXB8-JFm9olEU8e2U>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #53 (Remove reporting message size chunking) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 23:41:27 -0000

Yes,  but you’re speaking as a report CONSUMER.  Steve said “report
generator”, and the point is that there is no evidence that anyone
generates this.  Yes?

Barry

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 5:29 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> On Sat 29/May/2021 02:30:47 +0200 Steven M Jones wrote:
> > On 5/28/21 08:46, Todd Herr wrote:
> >>
> >> Consensus on Ticket #53 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/53>
> (Remove
> >> reporting message size chunking) was reached during the May 27 DMARC
> Interim
> >> to remove the feature and update the IANA registry and ABNF grammar as
> necessary.
> >
> > I support the removal, unless a report generator speaks up by June 11th
> saying
> > they support the feature.
>
>
> If, by supporting, you mean coding, then I, for one, support it.  What I
> do is
> to recognize the ! suffix and abort sending if that is exceeded.  I heard
> that
> Google instead do a real chunking; that is, they'd send a truncated report
> followed by the remaining chunks, all within the limits.
>
> However, despite my coding, that feature was never triggered.  And I never
> heard about the top aggregate report sizes at large provider's.
>
>
> Best
> Ale
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>