IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 21 July 2021 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C416E3A0C24 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 19:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=K2ris5Wu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=fwhrmJT9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQEPg_eH5plE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 19:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE053A0C1F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 19:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 61303 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2021 02:04:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=ef74.60f7809e.k2107; bh=JcnX8IvLvvj73Gf4Y1wFmHf7i5KSOWftb3QI4h+u1j0=; b=K2ris5Wu8mvV6tPTIVMquQRlij5hrhUzz3QTQIaKD9FcRe+sbe7BIsGMIifJZ3T28V3fK04zIQldEVO3CSW7ooPokbTLz/CECauugayzX9NwU84PoPveZMyLow4dlVodKYLPeDddWcTaz4Pbaj6OSZ9v/EsbRF5CoHaJvAgNlpbhKPI6h8tInMMxHF/Wm+SaHKhuoMits9YITav39hCrHqaEV76huz47LD/RGzAUOgTgO4O/zdqJ+FZZfXdwHzeRjjctU5oLlJHxRYLQji1c4eAye1ilEudi8Si0pbdV93P4iacfiOYka0aHHPafoD2aAbdsdaohEQH5/1hRdmqsbg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=ef74.60f7809e.k2107; bh=JcnX8IvLvvj73Gf4Y1wFmHf7i5KSOWftb3QI4h+u1j0=; b=fwhrmJT9VPvLxRLJQmmh4JzclD+1Mh17kdrfEjqQ4Nl9cuyFikHqodIC/ebU9XurA5mpx7uThpfXBY3IbmQ9Yt2PGjJAZagd4SuBh5g+gphg6QEEmQJxECXEn7PsFP2xD9Bz7u18prVaz3/3f/xxobZQhilFpU+iFo7s3MN3mk4cB4u/APPH0LUp6WasuJPrwndLTWwAzfAQ5Avkh9oLrPFTl6vNh5AB3WVZW2Pzmd6F6PUBe4thlGXxmXx5LGD0XeDOiKgEnlU9apFgkOndgNR937bNybdcmezDjorGHQV++x8jIwMnv6JKOqoRJ0wHuXeRlXfh3VRAWdCTC9LCug==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 21 Jul 2021 02:04:14 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D58EB24CA31F; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:04:13 -0400
Message-Id: <20210721020413.D58EB24CA31F@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <bf40d8ef-ee1e-3026-2017-6be909cc11f6@gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nrUx96uMyYQTuZgXzvQsY3YeHNo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 02:04:23 -0000

It appears that Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@gmail.com> said:
>If something is to be removed from a protocol, it needs to be removed.  
>So, remove it.

Since you're supposed to ignore unknown tags in the DMARC record, that seems
straightforward enough.

I suppose we should have a Former DMARC Tags registry to prevent them
from being recycled with a different meaning.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email