[dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept EAI clarification within email authentication stack
"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 03:01 UTC
Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9DA129C6B
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id b1WoNzhsxXdi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3E2F129619
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id q186-v6so6625407ljb.5
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:01:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=yxlGH8G7Aew5iu19UpjFUWOlykS4dZe9vIqE+a/4i8M=;
b=YpprLNI3t6Uw391fCAqEOWkLRuasrdDTu2pPoRtYd7FlY8BggKEoE6csjExIPM/IVO
mW+J7iTjtuXnXCNPmTi3bmxM9IhC2mW3JxvxoM9xgys2KYfxQFKwuPyFTVtZ//XJSN/w
YEmeaF47K8dxpXwD2Lyr0C1CEPNuGRsxk+cE0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=yxlGH8G7Aew5iu19UpjFUWOlykS4dZe9vIqE+a/4i8M=;
b=shzS6fdeOz+XN9y+6YXhHkOXf6GVzEX3JGxny0TyuIAZOgTdEDCKlDpOVyL94D3B55
mNjWz63bJRd4hjFUFaTopjh7MX3ji22+tWIHQS+zqaUzb72XbuxpnxpCGgi+bBQLRsYn
/qZiq6nfDY6H0FA1EYfEQnaRnPGRUljD5jncAyq8bhs+9Q2xIsqa1W4twnLSFmXvlRMz
ijPPRxWIxE3Gp9tikUE9lgGD9Tzit5+5RGtenoN7dv0GC+SsAjxer4hRoqBC2stdt+gW
PHaFMuOnIbAZZ/cCebrPjJYEkvooF6yvT/kG1K/puoPdM4w3vDJfU5Y91nOfVJ5gfpce
D5IQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJlOuuRI+6gWJj//SjV0Eq5/3uRg9B5LIjNw5iLo6DxsByXkh6q
H9YaiOffsW9KlBZdCZ7MqG+P+v4MFfOx7HD92OpJN+UvhbHyhA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eGtNCipuWlBCU3jaCuB9qmrBsuNADfUd4jWqOnHSk1ODm8WODwA1edkswsB9LO0RYV0Xj4XXTk80kV1bZoDVM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:50d:: with SMTP id 13-v6mr12900276ljf.85.1541386893709;
Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:01:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:01:03 +0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qC=Hwu=2zzmApHKQ68H-X0UmLBZnvzABeXAfD_A4F6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>,
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>,
"dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>,
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004307300579e21afb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/nxNenrb3gfrKkyolyUfn0doEJWA>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept EAI clarification
within email authentication stack
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 03:01:38 -0000
I think that we could possibly already read this into the existing charter, but the following one sentence patch makes it explicit: diff --git a/dmarc-wg-charter b/dmarc-wg-charter index a1d0fac..c8ac6bc 100644 --- a/dmarc-wg-charter +++ b/dmarc-wg-charter @@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ the working group can consider extending the base DMARC specification to accommodate such a standard, should it be developed during the life of this working group. +Clarifying the handling of internationalized email addresses (EAI) +throughout the authentication stack of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. + Improvements in DMARC features (identifier alignment, reporting, policy preferences) will be considered, such as: --Kurt
- [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept EAI… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed charter spiff to accept… Seth Blank
- [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Proposed charter spiff to accep… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Proposed charter spiff to a… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [dmarc-ietf] Does EAI doc need to flag SPF macro … Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Does EAI doc need to flag SPF ma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Proposed charter spiff to a… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Does EAI doc need to flag SPF ma… Seth Blank