Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-dmarc-chairs-slides-00

On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:01 PM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

>
> On 12/4/20 2:59 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 12/4/2020 2:51 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/documents/
>
> What changed in the bis version to change its intended status?
>
> There is a 'History' button to click on that page, to answer that question.
>
> 2020-11-11
> 00 Todd Herr New version available: *draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt*
>
> 2020-11-11
> 00 (System) Forced post of submission
>
> 2020-11-11
> 00 Todd Herr Set submitter to ""Todd M. Herr" <todd.herr@valimail.com>
> <todd.herr@valimail.com>", replaces to (none) and sent approval email to
> group chairs: dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
>
> 2020-11-11
> 00 Todd Herr Uploaded new revision
>
>
> is responsive to my question in what way?
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.