IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trac #6 - Normative filename construction

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sat, 14 August 2021 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98233A13EE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_87LstLxbvh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2033A13EB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1628954648; bh=r+rf91cjf1lLt+8yeSGUAKhRaVSAbr/xyepCKvkIoqg=; l=543; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AjKvsYWjjmFht6cCILjEKKd1ysMF0/dy21SNjFjmbYHx4UyK7IOgLOT4hyJKr/Yge CgRu3KEJYHo6HKzTX+AODV+VTr+5xJ/JF1Xkmz4Ruqfov9AfDeMoMgIEp8b9Ujxoln VrQOSf8We9/LddvM8VRFeoxx/8ZJuCCdloYV4HlKiXbVE4OuN1pa1LLBdLrga
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([2.198.14.128]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC03D.000000006117E017.00005373; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:24:07 +0200
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210813185313.677562634886@ary.local> <8aecaa3f-17b7-dd55-d804-0616a59574e2@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <1f8526d8-2dbc-c30b-9f78-c1e1ba93c294@tana.it>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:24:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8aecaa3f-17b7-dd55-d804-0616a59574e2@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/oJ6KJ08t7ELTqE3SbgcvEpqaH2Y>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trac #6 - Normative filename construction
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:24:20 -0000

On Fri 13/Aug/2021 22:43:35 +0200 Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 8/13/21 12:53 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> If I see an identical filename I assume it's a duplicate.
> 
> I would argue that the unique-id would benefit from a SHOULD status, 
> likely with a comment about avoiding the very interpretation that you 
> have.  An interpretation I tend to share.


It is important that the converse holds too:  duplicates MUST have 
identical filenames, irrespective of unique-id (and of format, if it's 
going to stay at SHOULD.)


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email