Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 28 February 2021 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E053A09B9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:22:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_OnjdVYWV3z for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C634F3A09B5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 21so6564282oiq.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:22:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QKQ9EbEMHALU7lPDnkglceWXenihIcDl7P+YRsWZs+A=; b=X3X9VboXgZfH/EaRHeP0V+K8IyL9+2eKqR+rgeJo/As7Jitpmlc6YwQA+E+pMBDj3R ayW8fU9sXDbsJFpcXeUCYRNlkJUPjt5+ZltUzgrfRoVOW9jdf1ZMMINe6ClWb/vQM9k/ 8z9j4ZoQoyimDMPCpzJ6wXZyetBGRzMiwyD6tmd5ms/2BCgOJcK5z/mxjqjPYXAtDqGP vjE8F+QnxdqsCPh8Ls7juzuaGPVkLk8lUqlV8K+AsVtbQxAHSyGIXvaOTEPsS44XYTxf izHlCKI49b/jzqIj35dnMFAIOcVZ0tu9bK7BerT9+MdU9RZk1vlsxwc3jHEnpI4ZJam+ e3pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QKQ9EbEMHALU7lPDnkglceWXenihIcDl7P+YRsWZs+A=; b=BOzYu5Im0lrDvkmd1M6ndiDsrFvFPdZLrAbUVhFbjSRtBYnXY0TpBxf7uxvx2uUaFl nVR/tvYFno1aMvG5BFjbi3mkpgQcEaoOVQDSt6yZAbxoYlKaaSDzKDZ5AwnOE/aZiAhC +eDiyHJLW/AT99a63IOpVcl2v+9OqCToMIic1W0DEiapO4iHJaijLSAWqKB4ml7UJFH0 5CeSx9oJgppj5GYZ41n2N9J+SV8YJVGvhxOxCVslx8XsRh3LuValozGWJYb9gapeN7vt U8mKbOi74+flkN8pETBC/3mq6zLdGeMSom0TwVzG/pzXsV29qHdbJSdMuT2DssxRJq5h btIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302O56U1tJm66BMDFztOVXM/vvz1KMsF67B9q5HyqZ74wxizUOk QN39u+lT28r0/je8ddVCDz58I4KWO60qh///4tA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTVKyPMt2SBUHCntn10pc30vbL0w/DEWjs72MGN0JJSOrp3zpofIgIoC9SArdVeRCoClTDbp7C0WaQFgeXy/Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:154:: with SMTP id h20mr9838840oie.45.1614550950545; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:22:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161144436332.13490.10651420808048876097@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+EhD0nz71dLtUFwb9V_6uuen-k6E5fpvrCg3ZYzfr2JSw@mail.gmail.com> <ba38a9e4-7f43-c747-2d90-f35de22a8399@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZJaEBrXdE9JOZNOJAgR7iEzfMA86Csi2sNtE5JC7ROUQ@mail.gmail.com> <c5cd9239-b204-255a-48a3-1cdccf18464a@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYrcg__sewPO+EWfJf-5uoHcnQpFqtw-QoXxngHTJvkAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDCeFQU9RTN6osPTrMpap-Djkx5+Czx=-nKqVeXnyEy1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZXkRMLXS7mt28-vEKKk4HgWkP98P8kdYaS1XbcYQvSxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLVGhaBhrmDSYayYrcU9JSq_pY6D8=KoirUGCrOeKeHCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVARxfJNUs+ve1ViDTF385QjLoyhw8JyKc-nALhuu=xoPA@mail.gmail.com> <81c05041-a4ad-a473-701c-0027cd503696@gmail.com> <CABuGu1pncrHQ-Ba7t7VEcbYrjfoc_Ek_3B5X66owSE2GWRdPSg@mail.gmail.com> <8c715354-54ed-434a-c630-bb3c902cb8da@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaZh_HHCVfVkHki497uaSSN-GCy2U=aueg7iR+jBGA0xg@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EtHS_Ke6b+fyuLrE2c1DL3a4XKCnf3745o=GvHfB1TxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJZWKyYO0xvJbTvc0xcjOxOQ6pJPGJVkViN+nkC_rT9hg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJZWKyYO0xvJbTvc0xcjOxOQ6pJPGJVkViN+nkC_rT9hg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:22:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E_kgDZahQkjBn-qUw5H_9EO67AYTr_TRi+ukGhKc3-tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000e128d205bc6cef14"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/oKHaf6e60sDAv2m8Qp3ypJOmDm4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 22:22:36 -0000

Thanks Barry

I sent a pull request along to Scott with the changes.

I also generated an rfcdiff which I include for completeness sake.

thanks
tim


On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 5:02 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> It looks right to me.  Thanks, Tim.
>
> Barry
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:53 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was just working on merging Barry's comments with Dave's and Kurt's.
>>
>> I attached what should be correct.  I would like someone to just double
>> check my work.
>>
>> tim
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:35 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> These all work for me.  Thanks for the contributions.
>>>
>>> Scott, please work your magic with a revision so the chairs can request
>>> publication and we can get this on its way.
>>>
>>> -MSK
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:13 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2021 8:41 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Especially in the case of the PSD policies, one should not expect that
>>>> the controlling organization would necessarily be "a mail-originating
>>>> organization". Generally the idea is to *disavow* being such :-)
>>>>
>>>> Suggested alternate text:
>>>>
>>>> Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)
>>>> permits a domain-controlling
>>>> organization to express domain-level policies and preferences for
>>>> message validation, disposition, and reporting,
>>>> which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> d/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Crockerdcrocker@gmail.com
>>>> 408.329.0791
>>>>
>>>> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
>>>> American Red Crossdave.crocker2@redcross.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmarc mailing list
>>>> dmarc@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmarc mailing list
>>> dmarc@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>>
>>