IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> Tue, 20 July 2021 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <me@junc.eu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9359F3A2E29 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=junc.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PhNWvM5bgp6A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.junc.eu (mx.junc.eu [172.105.72.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687273A2E28 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C77D80DD7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junc.eu; i=@junc.eu; l=495; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1626807139; h=from : subject : date : to; bh=wyB5slRVhlLFgBnlVh2iyHsDNoXBMWR0WfkvsnxB3hY=; b=YrNXsq6Hmg9D5If3ckCLqS6WaUCimYZjCPTHoZaNKGJjHH8VzMerl9CSEl21vxAYaFCki y8NBYObYav4VPkYQUxOOz59MLWPfAgJpg1xR+3EO0P4RII8bFhkvAsK7VaHmPijnR4jjrcU Go2e4iuTwnzUHaK+W6jwEXJRfN7Dxx3K8A9T7Pw8467vv5xXQprNbRwR0Ivwt3SznqUJYa1 gUsgMaOa5ZdTPVDlot9x2tSqb4dVXzO4BaN9jssIEkY7+Nf0YWXuC3zwsT0TXqc+UzhtTdL 8dSMqjOK+cBNZyYq/pNOSXFwFMgMCBBqoEOG6ZrHj3nfrHaaxL/qzXUCUfgA==
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [IPv6:::1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C92180A94 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:52:19 +0200
From: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYf0mE_1kY06J5Tuw3G5JySndqRPyu96uJjdWEWXgE0S+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHej_8=yvgXP2WgHayhGU2Hg2E0RcNgZBFjfw1cM-qKWkTG-+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48Zfys9cwTskjjdeJ14Y-wDBuqLseDEEiNvwC9BonLAwMyVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8mTF7DFwDiCHBq_mK40E+vuFS6iB+MQ3Co3pS=ZdqXkcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfwUAfwG93ZOoFp+Xbor-chZ-X0Pbd9OGdAs3mxsTFHxEw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJwS=OvWZypbfTHsdjSLeMNFaq5TM7De0MrQO32fz-cHg@mail.gmail.com> <99d648e3-9f72-393a-a16e-225e340a8152@gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYf0mE_1kY06J5Tuw3G5JySndqRPyu96uJjdWEWXgE0S+g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11
Message-ID: <52d3b7d214499c20a490baa4c43a998d@junc.eu>
X-Sender: me@junc.eu
Organization: junc.eu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/oSp-BVmmm3MoBC91HaFliCBAL_I>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:52:30 -0000

On 2021-07-20 19:16, Dotzero wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:39 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On 7/20/2021 7:54 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> I would like to see us deprecate PCT entirely,
>> +1
> +1

if this was postfix it would not be accepted, old habist must stay to be 
backward compatible, sadly not all understand why

with all that changes it could end with no one uses this good software 
writed after c code i provided :(

hope for there LTS of it all

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email