Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472C63A103C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:06:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqRUIk0nFBtk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F9A3A1012 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id f9so4198889pfc.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:06:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=SmkWBM5barcizC4SbwWvqYpwvGCc4Od9m3896CLdBL4=; b=WxL6m4JEAg9Ocwv4JzEPWiA/SfvTlnNA1kDPAy1Sq9fWXcl3D4+iFAxywtJJIuoFKD 1N/vt+6O5dxyFciSqvpmOrGVA9F2Voee2uQhNelcl9VyOo0DGR8WJFUV6PqTJPBiFDQB enrcPssEtnWQQj3vH4W670JCw51suMHM7WibXJKE1hgq/VDb8rmCbq9gdZ/FS6DO7z33 NKbu+yUYinyrhnfHS9mstpHd3vznaklflAElUdnk9Ypux7X/Ihti87pSjaLIy2kNTIFf tKBA34L1hBLv3lEnbBgKfa2WOOEfpzgZNxPb7ndsQVlT2aXsK5gwlVTJKiQ54VKzUSW3 bSsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=SmkWBM5barcizC4SbwWvqYpwvGCc4Od9m3896CLdBL4=; b=tS7CIkv//2AymEwA0qHE9Amiz2uPbx3YSMl/mkTO9IhKViCUlgofWPBpvro69TWrph hmbqt9/gs9kIy8LeJcrccQ7HFA8ZqGCyzxQpghRr0V+HJkgTWWuE4fQl0j4lEInPx4cO 3gB0WCc52wn7i+7kwwWC5k/PiMjCZTRp6T7sNRb+OrWmhp5W31E908so5Zknro93KHpa AeouVL/Wp8EBVZvTl75mL9fvKMinsSfcNEMyEl5os2IeascZrG9oVBKeCJHm9XAshbQ3 fFkLEOwf5r0sDcLejtBTK8Nx2Mpf+gdd6uE8qg5mC40B+8DVHIVwC4RRucrDpDG0GaR+ UQVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dt0qry62hjY4Ku0Lvbruho2tixczyV8mJob6w2l4DwcyfIfKh I4pGtiN3d1OWggwQx3ykLrJXo9f33Sc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6e4HLNLfc7vAS55mouVswGj+ldkhxT0qHNnGR6wW+cdX+TWcK9/V+fcOd/kw8CQztkIfLcQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8552:0:b029:18e:f030:e514 with SMTP id y18-20020aa785520000b029018ef030e514mr6108114pfn.2.1607123172957; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z25sm4759873pge.66.2020.12.04.15.06.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:06:12 -0800 (PST)
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com> <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53fefbe7-ed4e-e878-daa3-3f027772cad3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:06:11 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ockqeoHnS77kDw6Xnvrw6r1_Z20>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:06:22 -0000

On 12/4/2020 3:03 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-dmarc-chairs-slides-00 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-dmarc-chairs-slides-00>

Surprisingly, the wg datatracker page also has a 'Meetings' button.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org