Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> Sun, 04 August 2019 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F00D120077 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 01:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=aegee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwLbpYG8KX6H for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 01:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.aegee.org (mail.aegee.org [144.76.142.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C96120086 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x748IGqe022035; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1564906697; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; r=y; bh=RR78Q3lVKq0QE+ImZrOe7e+mEAv6ke8z54CAeXCcW9M=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cy5gUUTu5LJx3fqIavHzJqJxvR1sycklasrYRVPAdN50pxLEIuTRGyAoqviSVWzdr BXma42UcqQJGygpaASlT3pcoqpPMSd2N90uotO17qePy4HlP+wYQsE6bnRwq2KNWEv A6IHOCTG4gbr4/wxmaqubSKUiQkGM78oj1Y7JPXZbNEknTrFoqKlAxTx6ruwIko8KR dVodEFfj0G+9a/qQn+Dly0SFWtzfT5JoeGgqsmOhG/3Fy9DCwvk8w19wZRxiWtBGAN Sw+g43mB/oPOsiyiVt7c02XbmJ4ifA74QN21D8WWXUH08uyRs+3E5vqGTc1Qn6W3HL 2gKfzD4rViH69N7XPpBPJ2mnGiZj0pVCzTxiZK7g2nfxvhW+AidwbkUXPQCaKl5b9f mx7/cJbLnH6NE77b+SqBtxHXy5G8vn/GdYm4al2ODvJPEfIlfXopZFGhRBcqtjaNc/ wlgoy7O4RRjkhnurbvwwYwEzb0KS1S/hHTdn1k5GTVvkO6pgfB4Y/u+yZO3F20k695 RHOLizH6J8QlMkQ2tZIRKfWl2TuNdow5ibc0xALJlntlkelZHBWvyJXekR8rtXHpdJ Q1bhCqF8rUt4g2xKPcIIxdtfZ+B/+qQWKHUAIvemgIBxVh2f4JZQmisIMviBfZyjXw VBZ9lEWIdWqKJRwetj2EVBMo=
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x748IGqe022035; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan (87-118-146-153.ip.btc-net.bg [87.118.146.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x748IGqe022035 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Aug 2019 08:18:17 GMT
Message-ID: <d36a922d6bbb8426167e44d434e07b62faf86f21.camel@aegee.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
To: Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>, dmarc <dmarc@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 08:18:15 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5DD2CBA9-6F28-483C-9B08-8D3A41526BD7@wordtothewise.com>
References: <e84652a9df6b61e599f30e7fae6c0c728faf5ce5.camel@aegee.org> <5DD2CBA9-6F28-483C-9B08-8D3A41526BD7@wordtothewise.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.33.90
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.2 at mail.aegee.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/oe1VSCjyYEu44Ct_UVsQITVdNS4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 08:18:23 -0000

Hello Steve,

in both cases it is about information that was sent over from the same mailhost.  To whom the information was sent
decides the operator of the mailhost, not the one who suppresses failure reports.

In any case, for a failure report containing only the Message-Id it does not matter what information the email carried
and to whom the information was sent.

Regards
  Дилян

On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 09:07 +0100, Steve Atkins wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:41 PM, Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>; wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I just thougth once again on this.
> > 
> > Some of the senders of aggregate reports offer free mailboxes.
> > 
> > Aggregate reports show that emails from a host to a provider of free mailboxes sometimes do not validate DMARC.
> > 
> > The one provider sending emails opens a free mailbox on the receiver and then sends a secret copy of each, otherwise
> > ordinary delivered email, to that special mailbox.
> > 
> > Then the mails from that mailbox are downloaded, and the A-R header is checked.  By this way the sender finds out, which
> > messages exactly have failed DMARC validation.
> > 
> > At the end the same information is obtained, that can be obtained by exchanging a failure report: which messages have
> > failed.
> 
> Information found in mail mail headers in accounts that you have created includes email that's been sent to you.
> 
> Information found in failure reports includes email that generally was not sent to you.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Steve
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc