Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD DMARC: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd post-WGLC Status

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Mon, 14 October 2019 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD23F1208B8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=6HXIct0I; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=WMcuRg+L
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEodYPc9cnGD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75CD01208D7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C86F8035D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1571091681; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=sg7JAAryv7orVsqvq3+gPgyAd1R0lAfBEExZloVZ1OU=; b=6HXIct0IoTkFi7U5gPmh6gYNLfOXN8WRjJcM/+6gs5wYRCW9Zs+mc0ch WE/tN5hr+AgZh25J2MfFz0b78ZjXBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1571091681; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=sg7JAAryv7orVsqvq3+gPgyAd1R0lAfBEExZloVZ1OU=; b=WMcuRg+Lf9HI1dtJ18WkvGi4+gpuMTifnYidd1L5IUwYYU7rWzO+uwuF Y+ihoiSeTW3ABIJdX7PUmXT/ssGeErLLAg/ITbdLDOUA1skFfIGme8ebNj P1KPCjHYx8CqarKHza9o85JxUoXhI2L9lgrsg3s0pLLhLuCEIb0GNgFjMc 2GGF505GCn2z49o1DTgCTFsKI+SV84ibvjbTObbWABuVPh6EBO4B+xjbb+ 8WsS1MrNTL2Z3Z04iN5iUFQ/XwuOasEc3a5OkCAcm5YoS1TFrq7J3i32VX OuXEQ8Je0hQgisf7V6ZMqAPzbx3baUNdR4Tajs40EpUhzyyd8KdTkg==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBE2F8001E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:21:20 -0400
Message-ID: <2076880.dcr36rYjyA@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <1960529.BQ9LHqgqYc@l5580>
References: <2080369.Hr1xgu6sVx@l5580> <1960529.BQ9LHqgqYc@l5580>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ozxPxtA2dO-FNlzjZ-9lAOu4DzE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD DMARC: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd post-WGLC Status
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:21:33 -0000

On Friday, October 4, 2019 6:01:14 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, September 28, 2019 5:38:37 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Based on the post-WGLC discussion, I believe an updated draft before IETF
> > last call is appropriate with three changes:
> > 
> > 1.  Updated Longest PSD definition:
> > > 2.3.  Longest PSD
> > > 
> > > The longest PSD is the Organizational Domain with one label removed.
> > 
> > 2.  Addition of the PSL data format to Appendix B (it would be B.3).  I
> > haven't drafted text yet, but I don't expect it to be controverisial.
> > 
> > 3.  Add zdkimfilter to Appendix C (also didn't make text yet).
> > 
> > Unless someone tells me otherwise, I plan to go ahead with those changes.
> 
> I've done this now.  I've attached the latest rfcdiff from -06.  If you want
> to review the entire draft as it stands, it's available in the WG GitHub
> repository:
> 
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-dmarc-wg/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/master/
> draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07.txt
> 
> Please let me know if I missed something or if the new text could be
> improved.

Having heard nothing for 10 days, I went ahead with it.  The only other change 
made was to update the date.

Scott K