Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 23 November 2020 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D943A0C4D; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:00:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnGBIUqQcURp; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71D33A0C31; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 0ANJ4Qkm022110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:26 -0800
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson=40wisc.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <ed1e3ada-46a5-7489-908d-3935c576062@taugh.com> <9e6bac98-47fa-92e3-8552-7f4839d37e60@wisc.edu>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <77bbde18-5720-63ca-53b0-6b41f2ea60ed@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:00:45 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9e6bac98-47fa-92e3-8552-7f4839d37e60@wisc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/pHJUb14JauNlHGW5KojASCfCaTE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:00:59 -0000

On 11/23/2020 10:50 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
> Would it help if there was a new DMARC policy tag to trigger the tree walk?


policy tags are useful when one has a dmarc record that might contain 
it.  the challenge here is to find that record.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net