IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007243A09CD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:08:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=eddU1Cl1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Qsdx/zW5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUpFfcNURnLP for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9FE3A0994 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 43346 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2020 20:08:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=a94e.5fe3a3be.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=SUiYzxmBfEP9ORO1cZq6n/J8oFpLYE9ySY2AxBV2rwI=; b=eddU1Cl1TumwdyLGlc7Hr2Wu6/4IYMUUrNmosdgS4gbbqyQL6TWJh8y30KysBKmwCv2KAI/QwMSfyPANbnD+5Gtm3vV5zvUg5IfnG/Uf0OO5tBdLtBFRxzJrP7JsZARNzBhQrqIjqRm6JwI67pRpRdimHvSqjWr9N5+Qh7jArFRIUHHi+GvSoyP5RYbyZONFEB1shaZmbETxJ4ZTErkatlb1AvgbQbFlj/E20BKCzHGPHgSgr1aALJVNKfUAS/jyckp5aUtZPjc6uKKReKhd+RoSxrJqhXcE5AyC8khdfd5txMs/iUkaX7q5yHhMumOAPLW6p8FluVWbMC5CBAV6bg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=a94e.5fe3a3be.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=SUiYzxmBfEP9ORO1cZq6n/J8oFpLYE9ySY2AxBV2rwI=; b=Qsdx/zW5WKNZNbn5w8AltThMqCnPN4lQrYML8geI4W4dsW8cx0S4hobb+Am7KwV14FBIDTLptlJ4UgV2kYnFdQZP5nW15TnCVaDXRvTNTiQaWn4QltmGj+8gqH6xHq5HnEubIzmb+WdEjSuKjZIcBtrzM5ubdca1WeuPLHRYHM5BYeQrx6nLAvP6ASY1ys8Hs1Kpfb845zIoq6i8Nj7Ig7w+uAZSOMhQlA4SHY6MKGn1lcg5GSRAG5kGE4hC12OfbI7z/vc3a2NWEHDVUSX9wfwhwKfybM2igGQZFJW0d1rofNQiLaHZJ5kEtm7N84/UjrvbFD7NQJbtj6f1kxQFpw==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 23 Dec 2020 20:08:30 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:08:30 -0500
Message-ID: <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/pJ9jI9H4Uh1oxJiiq8wcVF-DoWQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:08:36 -0000

> Modulo a couple of tweaks (below), I agree.
> Tweaks:
>
> * s/whether or not/whether/
> * s/decoding/deciding/

Sure.  Now ship it?

> Failing that, I have another proposal to consider that might aid us in
> shipping a standards track DMARC sooner: Remove any and all mention of
> failure reports, and do all that in a later add-on document as was done
> with RFC 6651.

Given how marginal failure reports have turned out to be, that doesn't 
seem like a great use of our time.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email