IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1993A235F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-amK5RQD0cP for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1353A235C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id x9so15781405iom.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yEk38+qqtKMYFezGzjtu+p9tZxM/mfBA5tFQV5cUvIQ=; b=KhZfPlGnIsT01b8a43EGfPaYmtcpDs5Pmc+JZEffkRhf/ROKq2h7YL+1GnC9hlMUG/ 4klHVlchh6I0RWrU9TZPcbYaG1kbGIdz/M4UeBDAkZyPYuFJIFOb1zWZQGofJnfexOuG kNqr0/zxg5lufvstoRg2ELmwRu0+ag/YCkD/M=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yEk38+qqtKMYFezGzjtu+p9tZxM/mfBA5tFQV5cUvIQ=; b=lRTNyrZ3Yl5vh+hq3hOJgPARuQ4+O2K1YhVLMMCCIQ+a2/En2H3/UJtH5k0wEyobPf /HA+VNcMXxEhmyF9Cz5hhkWyO9SgSafTynfJ4LGdJEHap4bV8T94c/kiHfIhUt3GtuK5 4+N0oc1mNH08cbT2MXO1tLMpAasTNAZywNDW/Alp2aMaN04QxRE/MQB9WtQEJY/GgvVU TBc324ULTOYa3ybUUrLKNY/xnrHuTm87EaWlPaVKwMZiZmhyEAKndNoCTxOZ49RaSq3k R/4o1zw5GqOHejUMS0SnMecKYYTLkzQ6y9l0XLuFo+ARdPTuk9oGkJ0NbRCOkDegudbd 6tyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1xLSqClsXdKhNWVQ6CrSpL880pMBJOhC8E6m6unrxu6QmvyvCQ Ap+4mHnCmriAZp4ool2PdPHBX3dDQxBtHvNJ63BWfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsLAzb5WC3fRH7Q64dU91AwW8fakzcC1kg/h2GtSPaKc23cPp4OIWdw33v4MLh1XIzGoI6qQRq+tO80g2Kfs58=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d808:: with SMTP id y8mr1825916iob.121.1585670151914; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABa8R6tTPAtEyPRSGbWKafZVZ4u8v8sN1VpTpMLQCia2_+5zRg@mail.gmail.com> <20200330212312.341EB16CFEA5@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwZ5c29gNG97gkGBsKW9mauKey+ftSNgqF51Mx=ZV0ABpw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2003301907530.19701@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwZUvAhautBgLx72Wq6NNKjtqYyyywOz=5gC2_BHM1GUpw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZUvAhautBgLx72Wq6NNKjtqYyyywOz=5gC2_BHM1GUpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:55:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pcAhL+fQav_Mt6-speOUkX7i1NiMVQePdHGr=sdE8_FA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022dbad05a2289a8c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/p_egS6CYrtSWMmpTmymL-at3dTA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:55:56 -0000

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:43 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:21 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> > Does someone have a fix in mind that could be submitted as an erratum?
>> The
>> > intent was indeed to make the authserv-id either a plain old ASCII
>> domain
>> > name or an A-label which doesn't need quoting.  I missed that RFC 6532
>> > didn't update "value", unfortunately.
>>
>> Unfortunately, 8601's defintion is a mess.  At the bottom of page 15 it
>> says this about authserv-id, which contradicts the ABNF:
>> [...]
>>
>
> OK, what does the WG think might be the best way to clean it up?
>

 I think that John's suggestion (ABNF: " authserv-id = domain-name ") makes
the most sense and the fewest contortions.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email