IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errors in RFC 8601, was Question about changes introduced by erratum

Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de> Sun, 22 March 2020 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc@arcsin.de>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166A53A08DD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arcsin.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_sRB9t9v8-y for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scalar.arcsin.de (scalar.arcsin.de [185.162.250.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27A73A08DA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=arcsin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:date:message-id:from :from:references:subject:subject:x-amavis-category; s=dkim01; t= 1584914620; x=1586729021; bh=OA+QMNPPz/JZr0LvQAilcZ5oGraNbyTokLa pjRgz8o8=; b=mkmimt5sRIphl8zj6f8+0A/nUg8OuPefOC1K4ORjhxItcobGxWp AV0Pee4Fi2VEC+ql2GIRRiVONaQzjyMj5rNZpkSJqptwuLo+Yg+sK92bZY0dyTf/ A1+fdDUIthHh/XRyGXX246ZUXx6LBGwIw4Xmfg0uMOMHr16PndUN5FHU=
X-Amavis-Category: scalar.arcsin.de; category=CleanTag
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20200322154438.14E02166129A@ary.qy> <09ec8dda-7165-fae8-f8e1-f88561085e47@arcsin.de> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2003221534100.16773@ary.qy> <59f7d02b-e15c-25e4-2955-ea44615886e3@arcsin.de> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2003221638340.16970@ary.qy>
From: Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
Message-ID: <45864cb6-c8b1-5e4d-6bea-fe2ba8cc089b@arcsin.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 23:04:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2003221638340.16970@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/piun50ubzQcuUyxoGohpVNBdxgM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errors in RFC 8601, was Question about changes introduced by erratum
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 22:03:48 -0000

Haha,

I just found
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/FO6ImuO5jzr9ZvN6FcLAzMoH3-c/

Damian

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email