Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu> Fri, 31 July 2020 18:11 UTC
Return-Path: <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061FF3A0C27 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wisc.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gd2kjvcoWtOC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmauth4.doit.wisc.edu (wmauth4.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9FD3A0C25 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10lp2105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.105]) by smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190812 64bit (built Aug 12 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0QEC05OFGIIC1820@smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for dmarc@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:11:01 -0500 (CDT)
X-Wisc-Env-From-B64: amVzc2UudGhvbXBzb25Ad2lzYy5lZHU=
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-4, Version=6.4.7.2805085, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2020.7.31.180017, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.75.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2020.7.23.5750001, SenderIP=[104.47.58.105]
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GgHPbm+Y4j7L4ug77reKAqop09xtlsN2PHaxyJw+UbeCIErYdWby9rEysESJyu2FUUi7qsMeCnaW+w0JQuGSQOPWfoffN+5EtIQ2ciZbD2sEpkAaiN4+vBdCLhPrrK/Izd75CQvE+L9SRizSyYmqi/JoCT2oKIsWH7yTUqmKrVnhvt+RFPR9HmT1aMsypu4bS2gdc672mQugyfxH5/R2qlAEAXdgt8SQKOXqY7a9V9TaEaCbmrjlQV5WN9R9z6eSNYPhhfY9NHWmqisePnfpY0WYq3K1OCdEp80zVkXuSxs3uVoAfRQI/TnG2r/QVksU5mkeBrCkMWLW6xR3iur6gg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A5HQkQCiYfRuCsYiB/7TYJBsutcRNqCR9KE+JMXy9YI=; b=f0betLt/ZN3ORnmi3vL76HvQn9dV8l2peWvxtsfpL4kB5RSTHqvw8iymbA4CrqB6PbAjQaLSblF0UJRex3o372M3FkWMkAVbMRh6DDJSW7LX+4/pqw3FJ+B4Ga+/WQSk1qveOGet8BOEZ166MR19wBTjN22nvpzwub/jL7LqIy9tHpSAdwCk3M4SHZfzmoeUzmgVCDAAJ+Jxt60qi7nA7Ihw2ob2L0WIdL8xDXnptIxBqAhCd6xM8npgER6GW7W47hdvt8Dcxbiaf46SdMheLjYRqa4YJBBykMIqmLucLCKaH4ASeLCxaRYXVa0f7OYlN8OJjUMSMDDQrgK9II7KSA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wisc.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=wisc.edu; dkim=pass header.d=wisc.edu; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wisc.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A5HQkQCiYfRuCsYiB/7TYJBsutcRNqCR9KE+JMXy9YI=; b=pfYUKO2N+ZcTRgYHGWL4tkEiFpfGGEuPpIVsYhGHVO5+8dAVuJn+qhUHt+uB/pZrGAfviAuA4ATBw4f5aJfHrCUtLlIwrrSF4Ab0y8RKhzx7ZElnYWRtJDBX2WpkQ0ILHUJsSaUfBVNv0LjMYMzrldMbXFoPdCRM8wAUx0DwpA8=
Received: from DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:7b::16) by DM5PR06MB3259.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:3e::39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.26; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:11:00 +0000
Received: from DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a92c:9a15:1bb0:4bfa]) by DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a92c:9a15:1bb0:4bfa%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.033; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:11:00 +0000
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <BY5PR13MB29998094418C8A6C25902569D7730@BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <c0361cb2-b25b-5d75-cb1f-f9c87e3ecccc@tana.it> <AE9A3A9F-27FC-4935-B8E6-AB0CE1A6D5E2@wordtothewise.com> <d446c074-bbcf-a824-041c-e45958e0b0a2@bluepopcorn.net>
From: Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu>
Message-id: <b3dd7a3d-1dca-1ece-94f1-42b1e4a588e3@wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:10:58 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/80.0a1
In-reply-to: <d446c074-bbcf-a824-041c-e45958e0b0a2@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: CH2PR07CA0032.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:20::45) To DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:7b::16)
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [146.151.213.183] (146.151.213.183) by CH2PR07CA0032.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:20::45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.18 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:10:59 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [146.151.213.183]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: cbb8c1a4-b946-4f10-cb17-08d8357d143a
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM5PR06MB3259:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM5PR06MB3259D795DB32103AE75BA3F7F64E0@DM5PR06MB3259.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7691;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: OPiST3wyHW4g0uSDEEPRV49F8CoLYTJkhyj4tNr9tb+Mxffx54zuZ0Lcj+IuOSYGScgNo8qHASOZLCC8JcbiA7V1mZZRZJi6cT3gCm7+8FFbgnzarsJo4Zu2TXhW97BkciewAvSy+zwh0PRNDluqhObfPvm1TLpZKFKKWoUfYMiMGTpNSXdnKJ436gxnaD1S+LcYjwfsvTYjmDmCJv/3hUcd2gxvTqktdHBBdn99rTIB2bnIPF8Uznu/u1Hww/9FCQrxz6SvICGNTsb3nab1equntyG5neRONU5TsqMRAjKyS1ggvxvxgNlwz3+tUElolUtNoRSdrG1kYo+FyMpV7itsFHaU77Je7tLv+pAs1jprUC4XxnShobAJZBsQt+4Kproyc9nwQtIPbts5ECjeGaTzZuwihrqgHu7IOYmfw/DR9AhD3cNZHAbz1YDT1+hBYM3LNkFcgBv2NpumCPTptLvx8Sba0Tv9MgjLjJHjaNo=
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(396003)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(44832011)(316002)(786003)(53546011)(16526019)(16576012)(2616005)(26005)(8676002)(956004)(31686004)(36756003)(6486002)(186003)(75432002)(8936002)(2906002)(6916009)(4744005)(5660300002)(6706004)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(478600001)(31696002)(86362001)(3940600001)(130980200001)(223123001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: wisc.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cbb8c1a4-b946-4f10-cb17-08d8357d143a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2020 18:11:00.0576 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 2ca68321-0eda-4908-88b2-424a8cb4b0f9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: +0SWKeIg+2+c90VuNUrNM92SfXc36OFxwGySCIGXYXxbxF4eoSd8dt2tiuF197titKy1DevWJ8RldpM1wSZPew==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR06MB3259
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/pky-JoVJqN5JYG4orxN9La1Voew>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:11:05 -0000
On 7/30/20 5:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > There's an underlying assumption here that I don't agree with: that > DMARC adoption equates to the publication of a p=reject DMARC policy, > and that everyone (or at least all Fortune 500 companies) should be > doing that. p=reject should only be used when the usage patterns of the > domain support that policy. I'm more inclined to say that 85% of Fortune > 500 companies are savvy enough not to publish a policy that doesn't fit > their usage patterns. I think you're right, and isn't the market indicating that there is demand for DMARC designed for other usage patterns? e.g. Would the CEO of any of those fortune 500 companies like the idea of their personal address being spoofed? Jesse
- [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differ… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Luis E. Muñoz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- [dmarc-ietf] LSAP - Lightweight Signer Authorizat… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Tõnu Tammer
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… Rolf E. Sonneveld