Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Tue, 04 February 2020 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC956120131 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:49:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=LDThADd/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=NWt9lqEw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZ3fLkmgtadL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:49:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626E81200B7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:49:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E4EF80308 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:49:04 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1580845743; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=g0MNxG2H+alHQ9KQuvOauFuSmXKRt8yGy4SoKqC4um0=; b=LDThADd/uWbvTs6/H/F9dHjwxiCAA8Utx3gHvwKlgmfkWfUg+NBZkHlV ZIqitITmgx305gu1X1x0lRPSpUoSAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1580845743; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=g0MNxG2H+alHQ9KQuvOauFuSmXKRt8yGy4SoKqC4um0=; b=NWt9lqEw8GDQbiXHVZ0kr5QbmdxZJNN+WNu1AlEYY+aVecZPtAswB3W7 XWsRzV5xI6W4XdTqfmAIDj8xyMXz1rKJWlo9svgiPI/zptD+H6Khpl76BK 5jL8rj1S+u1ldj9iHh4F9X92zQNQS0TMWOatwvyPYaBafih0TXlrEYAnh2 LcmeSLHf5Wo6qm3HWGI7yFZyuZJgZUO3xzMOBtPkvWuaSiyz2dLQ1KIA0a WA278gj2iJqdvFkLUgx44l6SdmrjFs1MIgr+UqiNEy6EjSU3A1+8zMS71c t//o89XEmNsj8sBVB4edUY1YXRqhyq1uC29usezgm7H1K+2lkIyCfg==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1F04F801EA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:49:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 14:49:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3386547.LmEUfHP9lS@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1q+bZvSj0K4KZWdmcoD0n-GFuo=wwqm_kV=Wx-+cB_d2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY-v-VS-Wai-aqGRPOj1i8HxqMrYybzsNJGzN2dTHvG9w@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1q+bZvSj0K4KZWdmcoD0n-GFuo=wwqm_kV=Wx-+cB_d2A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qM6Oj7PfJNHe-PnARuUvpa63nrk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:49:07 -0000

On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 12:39:09 PM EST Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> I support publishing the I-D as confirmed in the WGLC with (perhaps) some
> additional caveats regarding the ephemerality of the Experiment as deemed
> necessary by the chairs.
> 
> Given the expected duration of the experiment (at least a year to collect
> some useful data, if not 2-3 years), I also support unblocking the other
> work in this WG since we ought not wait for this experiment to "conclude"
> (whatever that means) before proceeding on other work items.

I don't see any reason the other WG items can't proceed in parallel with the 
experiment.  I believe the changes to DMARC to bring it to IETF standards, 
particularly the need for an alternative to the PSL, will take significant 
effort to achieve.  As a result, I think there's little risk that results from 
the experiment will end up being a critical path item for any WG effort.

Scott K