Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 24 January 2021 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184923A0B92 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=oKNZQyBz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nb1vy86O
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UL7L5uCyOJ5Q for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BD73A0B8F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 80079 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2021 21:36:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=138cc.600de86e.k2101; bh=mggwmud3u8P1fIxmwgK10JPHOcR28+xL/+i7dPGC1bA=; b=oKNZQyBzpFcn7xocHFIeRzsmQtOpFKpsDvNVjfSLvx064asFkO1TvZx7b/zbE70FC6WrV9vNntuAMpm7+f/6CEPjCMeuHh6cK/cxfGuqkJEma1WMva8SoePEGSg/Yyu8zqmso45SN3MkZg6isigQzhaRtfq/Lq/61hJvfdHAVm7VJJ+idgwIaSLIx8AVAGWUx/dorrLWQVkTE99oKC+iPpKVAvGGL2yPmf2WVcXY3drVoy89wq9doHIkY1WCyBfgdvvjEWiuXCPuV0Pu0TOtUUBOdJ4Bs3cWMtFx/T9OTZhM2TaJ3+HCYath5ySFsmtg9qRdMxRZMk5DBwTAoL7hoQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=138cc.600de86e.k2101; bh=mggwmud3u8P1fIxmwgK10JPHOcR28+xL/+i7dPGC1bA=; b=nb1vy86O/0fWbF9pislLXwK9oZBqG9nwA47xzXCBJbLj11Idoro6VkD8r/vGvmqdw/6jkTcnWm0hPrQmn7nsAxK55ftS4OI9Lygm2BlgT5JlPbQTy9vdzvmpNUYhRhmZkk0dzj4SI4mwEFK25pycFTRxMImOEzP/lmOoLI4YgqCk61qRj3g9daHuu6oeKFOQNYp1qcb4ROCkCwhGLjNFkKUXvMx2C4jerYvaH7W0+48WD3iFeeuVvH3URW0o7CEK9vvjqpJFPXhQtHDSDQhSzNE8yu5YdXuIumW5/LYWQH7YRvVI9Ncn/92gaTBqN5MydtnYb0+zzVpAB3oOxvJSQQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 24 Jan 2021 21:36:46 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id CAD5E6C0889D; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:36:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: 24 Jan 2021 16:36:45 -0500
Message-Id: <20210124213645.CAD5E6C0889D@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: mike@mtcc.com
In-Reply-To: <c682449b-6e7a-60b5-73a8-8497aa3a1929@mtcc.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qOLByxB0YjTWYfsLER08zAUXjeg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:36:51 -0000

In article <c682449b-6e7a-60b5-73a8-8497aa3a1929@mtcc.com> you write:
>any reporting needs to be authenticated. if you're going to use http, 
>you need to show how you're going to do that.

DMARC systems have been producing and consuming reports for a decade
without authentication, without any problems I am aware of other than
the occasional failure report loop, so we have practical experience
telling us this assertion is not true.

R's,
John