IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E0D3A0BBC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGbMcXiLwH7L for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 880663A0BB8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id n18so9405524vsa.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v4BtxSnBWG2MXxBJPQXeNIOG5lgorkfKCqswbFc72rI=; b=DpGV50PWAi4MnJIIR9efqwYf5qNync6zPVkCFUP56Gr//Sray8BBee+MnV9LTxIdWW U69aZ4a4gh+HVHJEsKzGveQs7DwM2cCInj4HdTTjAGkW6ibi0pnz2Pq04YiPuJ4U2+I3 75pGvf8NBI/cl8pJllyZzXFscohyDtt9pHT/huHTQFKGlIrXn1JuOVa4MjFJ5LsL7o+l oy2I0kWNUQqcmrhVrfixXQm5jM1CPDBrnZTSqtTC/XZf05Xobk16q86XmhOGCbIpzEc0 RFCJnGh5JA1hcy1xdntYFxHBicd9mK9EpSEYoofqTYhT1XjcborbIqA3CmLOCM5wmH5Y kzJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v4BtxSnBWG2MXxBJPQXeNIOG5lgorkfKCqswbFc72rI=; b=Sa1z/heqSh1elziyygLEwGy+Y1KKy3xueZ8/QWF3HzYduRxd7Dbf/Os+kV0bKsXzoA lzEpQ/4h+Mtq3ziV/Axh8Srs5TU9B+6aR/awu93Jnb4lI+5Nmepwi0vSu63YZtjINKYw trJPh2S282BeEWgeVuCxV75tvBrykUVVS0j4Q9c7x6ngF+RtoPtPlf2VlIa31V0wWp/m ItA81kgfK/k8tVcNAWP3U9mfxdaBkPqsZBROisw3+pL4wljARlOzzYdUrxU0lM+2/9x2 iGXBfGxtHZ3ahRnuiD3wSsx4ykXKgcD8OQ2PLvcqPwxPILZF2M6YFaT8TK6HQpMW7njG 7iiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301ynCnXQUJVcBWyQ3U4IB9sYZFNgvc9xv8FcQSWMNjobQ87qmY 5AOse95Aw93NrsygiJBG4ILLrnv+7Gf7BK9ZUvmkEZ/R8AY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy07HJf+B1ThpENgXcTJBRqegLzhMts8YpepDLHxXlOsTl7dtWv9kQd0ptEsZ+Dyznw8rP31S/od0bQmVy40/4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:808:: with SMTP id g8mr5528318vsb.0.1611681827315; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210125212225.9045B6C14E41@ary.qy> <5749790e-c305-b77d-a2f7-94c30579aa4e@tana.it> <bbff75e7-9580-cd37-da2-e797a53859f3@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <bbff75e7-9580-cd37-da2-e797a53859f3@taugh.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:23:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbPNw-LaCJPUBNZk_ZNZ76bNTzb+7OHBWeiYsYyZQJZxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cee2bc05b9d0ea04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qRowKcYqh-LvIkV0mITmFNDkpbk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:23:50 -0000

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:16 AM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >> Sheesh.  That isn't mission creep, it's mission gallop.
> > The spec can be commissioned to a narrowly focused WG (like dcrup).
>
> Really, no.  It's something we might think about on its own merits some
> other time, but its absurd to try to do it as a detour from DMARC.
>

+1.  I don't see why we wouldn't just recharter this group (if that would
even be necessary) to do it.  The right audience is already here.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email