IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-03.txt

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011001200FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gk4RdKyGwHZZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B353C120099 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id g18so267943otj.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8keX/EVxzWuWdxFj7/Uf32tuT99CCK1pdlSaPT4WHbA=; b=ilYX7MnOgOJ0PfmjsxfRJtRWDjVaRBwqutEhyAD9itD6++HgAcnaZzBzAq2QyArFYL 5b9vAXXUmFAuliDaBaYcgpzNQtLYVTR34ImKNYO+g4j28uXK4A0BqQNqHK+llte6VmKc 9inNqpzvI3YRSmmB4ZoH6UMsXPEKemafu6w8MQGl82n/cCAZgEhKneb3pYNi3in6iiK9 9w7IRvCFhyLoX+M7eVekg9jkIPFX91/BRBd06GMkiI6WAjQNx7WXA+Mg/6Lzictbh78V jB/lcZDSOBWJq+xrtkOFUiMcnvKNjmmGmQxEfkawXk8sIi/iOPQu4hIYi5olO6gZwcd4 +2QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8keX/EVxzWuWdxFj7/Uf32tuT99CCK1pdlSaPT4WHbA=; b=MLyr6b4uWLu01gvohLkQpEJEAcr2pvTDCsUX0fP2XeQWqqqkCkTTNAYZqDlA1fi9eL SHLniIQKKjdJnsgBAWJUmVntqNQRW7n7YbPdWLtuepm14C+WCdis86JI8K++VPan1dRO UVlPe5p05ltK2CBa4kyKfCipo676OsLbARxR/OLmcrem/kZaDbaENi/Bbfg4zvL0uOG9 XCgsw8BORvH83lS33p4mUS+v2BS9noJMxICEF3OQzSpazc2SdQTcu8tJ3tsiNEXXGfn+ au0DiubOvHQrfRjgqazHhmPHWCcXuyZUx7niJ8gaUmE1XWl4ADirRg0eOHCAtYkwTx8p sYsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrzlpmtWlCWQniB4882Rs9iMSt17FCzGM6xhgA0wvVgtsNX5l0 2RDyfusG6I3B0LzhtNyfEx8Dbd30hNrCWhk/ioTpWg45cw0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwf2I4RoJwdPGsEaaMhfNOX4ayrmuRthlcjkCtmckbxFpJID5iT4Ibb+3jMzqMoFmzaxCkiiKeNEMTOaky5g1U=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6548:: with SMTP id q8mr1777326otl.132.1557932684586; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155728145158.24534.10112720017814447505@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD2i3WMKUm51tjXc+cQVqri-wQqJJENd=33Ah45knm0BtODXew@mail.gmail.com> <e94283b9-5706-89be-dc4e-78bdf372510f@tana.it> <3063446.ceL4kMytFt@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <3063446.ceL4kMytFt@l5580>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:04:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNdKiWC4bQ9PMZqSdCu6RPunoLTSNDGDYojSkn1tYNLsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003fedb80588ee78d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qnrcNXgVPg6R-Uv70qboBiCOGo0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 15:04:48 -0000

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:24 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> There are multiple types of entities running PSDs under multiple sets of
> rules.  I don't think it's nearly that simple.  Transparency only helps
> moderate bad behavior where there are alternatives.
>

Agreed. Which is why I think litigating behavior of failure reports is a
separate matter for the working group, and we shouldn't shim new normative
behavior into the PSD draft.

That said - I'm still unclear if anyone agrees with me or if I'm the lone
person concerned about this, in which case I'll gladly shut up. Regardless,
I believe this document is ready for WGLC and we should proceed with it.

Seth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email