IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reporting DMARC policy in A-R header fields

"Stan Kalisch" <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net> Fri, 02 August 2019 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F83F120135 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=cleO7+fL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bEId8Ghw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iw7H4TZu2Wwb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB73612002E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C208321F85 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 02:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap6 ([10.202.2.56]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:23:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=HWZE4LlWNViIUuk0669Q3RNbLkRj9j2 Og6dGV0YOv+g=; b=cleO7+fLPMvIYto90dpfwW6L0aFhUTxmobDJFCRsIcCr8tu 2ShmT22PaXmd9W6EqtkIOvSPlbQo0prgyAqoYN7HhffQAoHkDHrO45ufYYHF1eGj ISSa7b5mZa/kH5jHGkONrvgRUUKGIVSzKiPOTXETfZriEEZawBQ5ueATKO1/Vff4 +CA6OkbhwN1EOXWh7Jmu6FGhb8HeDkguKZSvbcFYB4nqDb0N5NQVYymy5i6Z22YT +qkVhss3vYxPHqNOCgcCg4q710w5ReWlGkEfqflJfm49QMKPGa6kPK5POob6lzvi MOv2gh/uxYIs+x5wqs2X88yJpvmojmbr5jffO8w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HWZE4L lWNViIUuk0669Q3RNbLkRj9j2Og6dGV0YOv+g=; b=bEId8GhwJICBBq1zYAaoWi 2wfJLD65sL5lW62VBXZsRmrnSj90QO/qiqDOJ74hgyvF1Xeqoink10WEk6jKvoJM lhW5x450wlC2MizoyybamS9nUdFVRCiTThYr3XYbP+FZDLAQzV2ViVxRMn4eo4fb UtJl+VIuGgYRUa4jjqlo6u1HQ+HWsUki+f9K4VNZbjfYFyhNaN9mx87/8ab+856K e7Zqt4SfN7a7VH+VZJx9j9FM1gOuYwjNJQ/WpA+U3diquSDsu8rOaRI1FALQNQ1r fRpjOzG+Gp8ZKUG6dxSGy2pm6/Da7aW/XVCXXwhSevD276HV4xiiLHqVUn4tTt5w ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:69ZDXeq3-saNitxYH7VY7PFqzTYFgxF18xbSByAufdZEmpvIXmRaVQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleekgddutdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfufhtrghnucfmrghlihhstghhfdcuoehsthgrnhesghhl hihphhgvihhnrdhmrghilhhfohhrtggvrdhnvghtqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepshhtrghnsehglhihphhhvghinhdrmhgrihhlfhhorhgtvgdrnhgvthenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:69ZDXSoCt0qiSGyNmHGu_5w3QPRfVJVeXvut4oDwwWcz7iS87dBNdQ> <xmx:69ZDXeAQVjpnHrG7S86u7Mg_fDB-WZl_fGu75Z6CZgkLxAFmcB7aMQ> <xmx:69ZDXQuAwLoN5Qoiz9uzAzq0OM1uJ8oHRCVDn9fBHvcQMV488rpjtA> <xmx:69ZDXRapSbdrsBijotV8i4VYUrVWQ_wuy1z8PcKAI8L_BpOYrYuAOw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id F229D1400EE; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 02:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-799-g925e343-fmstable-20190729v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <d94cc4f0-cf2e-4cd1-95b3-9c00d7e50966@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190802031401.2C5AD752163@ary.qy>
References: <20190802031401.2C5AD752163@ary.qy>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:23:37 -0400
From: Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="258ba014b92e49458c64c1d848f1143a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qv6cxW27XCxWykOCh-4L_PvUlZU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reporting DMARC policy in A-R header fields
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:23:42 -0000

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, at 11:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
> Catching up on my mail after a laptop disaster, ...
> 
> In article <4600949.rz9u5RyGOV@l5580> you write:
> >I think comments should be free-form. If we want data that can be machine 
> >parsed, we should specify it.
> >
> >I think the above works in ABNF terms. It's:
> >
> >Authentication-Results:" authserv-id; method=result ptype.property=value 
> >ptype.property=value
> 
> I agree. We all put the DKIM stuff in comments but that's silly. If
> it's worth recording, it's worth doing in a way that we all agree
> about and can parse.

Yes please.


Stan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email