[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 29 January 2021 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824833A1048 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:59:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7VOusrfVf3p for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA073A1042 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id 36so8852032otp.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:59:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=riZ5+OCu7wvtKlxFx4PPZjLaCqw7UzbXTWuOBVLzOiE=; b=ocMfMmoXuUoFn+BfUUCpBoB+hpVCDcmD1Rz96j8ZSgPt4EyjYx2GRrHPuHakf0cbx+ diZ0sSBP49v7xNrOXBt8CsxhRLkymn1Z9yZxY2au5DpgD10mRiNYKrHunUPObQbhvd5m Ib8UBq3z5bq0+i9EM2fGJx/JUi/O05eFHfwXCYWB+21uo1Pip8hA6806J/1Sy5pX9Sj7 cFIfb+bjDwzOouYrWZODL7X9n7zlm7EX29X0zjMdIKlRp41EunNvRs8GCTb+TKfoHdZF RwO89eh9Quua6nsXgfHl/E+3hkyJLgzCi/ffgMJ4chFEsI1KZL6zpKUjCHScCVTuU2Vo NgKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=riZ5+OCu7wvtKlxFx4PPZjLaCqw7UzbXTWuOBVLzOiE=; b=XOy3J3eXDxkxfqF1N5djKVpaoFNaBjOnnOsfM9g1XzhEBXUPYhBLy2pEXfvD/wk0dB uaYDfjQLak/ggv75BkUswpmMQiJ4McA11q0EIhncaLgYkJiwRiKgVMpZVtZTu68v5nxl a9YIBd9lllee/r593QVK2vL+AOIHINeyNboc1k6BnZFgYJXzjbp6VUcYB3xJnVLyVfOI Ci8ckdMlulSxUChMnBFbtRLwLcO0HwqTSFyXtl5DIi7a0f+fEi/235Uunx5xCyN0v0mj Yn9htEq0wQUBc6GTx8gHW3fiupqyXHE5YKVNgkuNT5TmEYj4A/UE1WZvGm51pEYdENOy xksg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kobrOYGzm0dmmpngXGU94HMlXHbadaNnAofADEMCGBKbfRYZq CEpJXnSYDPJD/dJH240NbdqNNKoP7cwZ0uFlJCdRsAw8dFA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJX3rIlFp6RB/boVq+vnHywhfWFQa24ya+CcFu5A6j5cuiYeLWDMm8zmmB4kAb2LteNobI8bCnkPqhrDo01uw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:208d:: with SMTP id y13mr3220623otq.288.1611932381934; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:59:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161144436332.13490.10651420808048876097@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161144436332.13490.10651420808048876097@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:59:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EhD0nz71dLtUFwb9V_6uuen-k6E5fpvrCg3ZYzfr2JSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006f8d505ba0b41f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/r9gyec6b6bq7Gwf2NX0xQOpXLPo>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:59:45 -0000

All

We've done a number of updates to the PSD document to reflect the GEN-ART
review,
mostly to expand on the experiments.  There has been enough changes that we
want to do a short
working group last call.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10

To look at the differences, I would suggest looking at this diff from the
-08 version and the current version:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08&url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10

This starts a *one week* Working Group Last Call.  Please review the
changes and offer up comments.
Offering suggestive text would be really useful as well.

This WGLC will end 5 February 2021

tim


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 6:26 PM
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <dmarc@ietf.org>



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Experimental DMARC Extension For Public Suffix
Domains
        Author          : Scott Kitterman
        Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
        Pages           : 14
        Date            : 2021-01-23

Abstract:
   DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
   Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating
   organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for
   message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving
   organization can use to improve mail handling.  The design of DMARC
   presumes that domain names represent either nodes in the tree below
   which registrations occur, or nodes where registrations have
   occurred; it does not permit a domain name to have both of these
   properties simultaneously.  Since its deployment in 2015, use of
   DMARC has shown a clear need for the ability to express policy for
   these domains as well.

   Domains at which registrations can occur are referred to as Public
   Suffix Domains (PSDs).  This document describes an extension to DMARC
   to enable DMARC functionality for PSDs.

   This document also seeks to address implementations that consider a
   domain on a public Suffix list to be ineligible for DMARC
   enforcement.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc